[postgis-devel] MOTION: drop legacy_compatibility_layer.sql

Chris Hodgson chodgson at refractions.net
Thu Mar 15 10:24:22 PDT 2012


+1

I had assumed it wasn't being installed and was just there to save 
people between rocks and hard places.

Chris

On 12-03-15 08:32 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 04:14:55PM +0100, Sandro Santilli wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 04:12:44PM +0100, Sandro Santilli wrote:
>>> I'm still confused about the difference between legacy.sql
>>> and legacy_compatibility_layer.sql. But I do see that legacy.sql
>>> _includes_ the other, so is a superset of it.
>>>
>>> Now, why do we have two again ?
>>> Note we're installing both...
>> I took a look at the manual and it only mention "legacy.sql"
>> and "uninstall_legacy.sql" so I'm guessing the
>> "legacy_compatibility_layer.sql" shouldn't really be installed.
> So Regina called for a vote about this. Here it is:
>
> Should we stop installing legacy_compatibility_layer.sql ?
> I'll start with my +1
>
> --strk;
>
>    ,------o-.
>    |   __/  |    Delivering high quality PostGIS 2.0 !
>    |  / 2.0 |    http://strk.keybit.net - http://vizzuality.com
>    `-o------'
>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel




More information about the postgis-devel mailing list