[postgis-devel] Ack! postgis.control is not getting install!

Paragon Corporation lr at pcorp.us
Sat Jun 8 12:34:30 PDT 2013


Steve,

Does the  

Wget http://download.osgeo.org/postgis/source/postgis-2.1.0beta2.tar.gz

Work okay.  I still haven't had a chance to test locally.  I verified that
the control files are being included in the tar ball but acutally building
form svn isn't working either.

I checked winnie's installs and noticed the installed version from pg9.3w64
in her folder is dated 6/4/2013 and so are all the sql files which matches
with what you are saying.

I've ticketed this issue
http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/2356

And will try to trace what change broke this.

Thanks for catching it though.  We currently have no mechanism in our
regression testing to test extensions (so I just do before I package or on
various spot checks) so its REALLY great that you guys do.


Thanks,
Regina
http://www.postgis.us
http://postgis.net



-----Original Message-----
From: postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Stephen
Woodbridge
Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2013 11:14 AM
To: postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] Ack! postgis.control is not getting install!

OK, Below is what I did and what's in the extensions and contrib
directories. I can not install 2.1 at all as an extenstion because the
control file and all the sql files are missing.

-Steve

# old beta3 may 23rd that worked installed cd postgis-2.1.0beta3dev sudo
make uninstall cd ..
rm -rf postgis-2.1.0beta3dev
wget http://postgis.net/stuff/postgis-2.1.0beta3dev.tar.gz
tar xzf postgis-2.1.0beta3dev.tar.gz
cd postgis-2.1.0beta3dev
./configure --with-pgconfig=/usr/lib/postgresql/9.2/bin/pg_config
make
sudo make install

And this is what I now have in my /usr/share/postgresql/9.2/extension/
related to postgis.

postgis--2.0.0--2.0.3.sql
postgis--2.0.0alpha1--2.0.3.sql
postgis--2.0.0alpha2--2.0.3.sql
postgis--2.0.0alpha3--2.0.3.sql
postgis--2.0.0alpha4--2.0.3.sql
postgis--2.0.0alpha5--2.0.3.sql
postgis--2.0.0alpha6--2.0.3.sql
postgis--2.0.0beta1--2.0.3.sql
postgis--2.0.0beta2--2.0.3.sql
postgis--2.0.0beta3--2.0.3.sql
postgis--2.0.0beta4--2.0.3.sql
postgis--2.0.0rc1--2.0.3.sql
postgis--2.0.0rc2--2.0.3.sql
postgis--2.0.1--2.0.3.sql
postgis--2.0.2--2.0.3.sql
postgis--2.0.3.sql
postgis_tiger_geocoder--2.0.0--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
postgis_tiger_geocoder--2.0.1--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
postgis_tiger_geocoder--2.0.2--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
postgis_tiger_geocoder--2.0.3--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
postgis_tiger_geocoder--2.1.0beta1--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
postgis_tiger_geocoder--2.1.0beta3dev--2.1.0beta3devnext.sql
postgis_tiger_geocoder--2.1.0beta3devnext--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
postgis_tiger_geocoder--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
postgis_tiger_geocoder--2.1.0SVN--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
postgis_tiger_geocoder.control
postgis_tiger_geocoder--unpackaged--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
postgis_topology--2.0.0--2.0.3.sql
postgis_topology--2.0.0--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
postgis_topology--2.0.0alpha1--2.0.3.sql
postgis_topology--2.0.0alpha2--2.0.3.sql
postgis_topology--2.0.0alpha3--2.0.3.sql
postgis_topology--2.0.0alpha4--2.0.3.sql
postgis_topology--2.0.0alpha5--2.0.3.sql
postgis_topology--2.0.0alpha6--2.0.3.sql
postgis_topology--2.0.0beta1--2.0.3.sql
postgis_topology--2.0.0beta2--2.0.3.sql
postgis_topology--2.0.0beta3--2.0.3.sql
postgis_topology--2.0.0beta4--2.0.3.sql
postgis_topology--2.0.0rc1--2.0.3.sql
postgis_topology--2.0.0rc2--2.0.3.sql
postgis_topology--2.0.1--2.0.3.sql
postgis_topology--2.0.1--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
postgis_topology--2.0.2--2.0.3.sql
postgis_topology--2.0.2--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
postgis_topology--2.0.3--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
postgis_topology--2.0.3.sql
postgis_topology--2.1.0beta1--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
postgis_topology--2.1.0beta3dev--2.1.0beta3devnext.sql
postgis_topology--2.1.0beta3devnext--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
postgis_topology--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
postgis_topology--2.1.0SVN--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
postgis_topology.control
postgis_topology--unpackaged--2.0.3.sql
postgis_topology--unpackaged--2.1.0beta3dev.sql
postgis--unpackaged--2.0.3.sql


And in the contrib I have:

ls /usr/share/postgresql/9.2/contrib/postgis*
/usr/share/postgresql/9.2/contrib/postgis-2.0:
legacy_gist.sql               rtpostgis_upgrade_20_minor.sql
legacy_minimal.sql            spatial_ref_sys.sql
legacy.sql                    topology_comments.sql
postgis_comments.sql          topology.sql
postgis_restore.pl            topology_upgrade_20_minor.sql
postgis.sql                   uninstall_legacy.sql
postgis_upgrade_20_minor.sql  uninstall_postgis.sql
raster_comments.sql           uninstall_rtpostgis.sql
rtpostgis_legacy.sql          uninstall_topology.sql
rtpostgis.sql

/usr/share/postgresql/9.2/contrib/postgis-2.1:
legacy_gist.sql               rtpostgis_upgrade_20_21.sql
legacy_minimal.sql            rtpostgis_upgrade_21_minor.sql
legacy.sql                    spatial_ref_sys.sql
postgis_comments.sql          topology_comments.sql
postgis_restore.pl            topology.sql
postgis.sql                   topology_upgrade_21_minor.sql
postgis_upgrade_20_21.sql     uninstall_legacy.sql
postgis_upgrade_21_minor.sql  uninstall_postgis.sql
raster_comments.sql           uninstall_rtpostgis.sql
rtpostgis_legacy.sql          uninstall_sfcgal.sql
rtpostgis.sql                 uninstall_topology.sql




On 6/8/2013 10:50 AM, Paragon Corporation wrote:
> Guys,
> Sorry about this I'll check on this issue why no control file.  No 
> postgis-2.1.0beta3dev is not stable.  That is why I put a dev at the 
> end of it.
> The one you want to use for stability has no dev --- 
> postgis-2.1.0beta2
> http://www.postgis.net/2013/05/11/postgis-2-1-0beta2
> Sorry for the confusion.  I changed from our standard development 
> extension (SVN to dev) in case one day we won't be using SVN.
> As a general rule, we always put our tagged builds on our osgeo 
> download site.
> Thanks,
> Regina
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> *From:* postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] *On Behalf Of *Daniel 
> Kastl
> *Sent:* Saturday, June 08, 2013 10:16 AM
> *To:* PostGIS Development Discussion
> *Subject:* Re: [postgis-devel] Ack! postgis.control is not getting
install!
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Stephen Woodbridge 
> <woodbri at swoodbridge.com <mailto:woodbri at swoodbridge.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Dev,
>
>     The current postgis-2.1.0beta3dev.tar.gz and svn are not installing
>     the postgis.control file. The other two control files are there.
>
>     Poor Daniel has been setting a travis instance for pgrouting and
>     puzzling over this issue because we require pulling 2.1 and doing a
>     local build and install from that for pgrouting. So I guess we
>     running a postgis build-bot also :)
>
>
> Well, Steve told me that the postgis-2.1.0beta3dev.tar.gz is changing 
> every night, which explains that it worked still 4 days ago. I thought 
> it would be a "stable" beta.
> As a Travis newbie I thought I messed up something with the install 
> script ;-)
>
> Daniel
>
>
>
> --
> Georepublic UG & Georepublic Japan
> eMail: daniel.kastl at georepublic.de 
> <mailto:daniel.kastl at georepublic.de>
> Web: http://georepublic.de <http://georepublic.de/>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>

_______________________________________________
postgis-devel mailing list
postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel





More information about the postgis-devel mailing list