[postgis-devel] 2.1 beta status Vote: +1

[Bborie Park]

I'll have ST_ColorMap done sometime next week.

-bborie

On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Paragon Corporation <lr at pcorp.us> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 18:03 -0400, Paragon Corporation wrote:
>
>>> I'd love to.  Does it require it to be feature complete though or does
>>> it not have to be feature complete for beta?
>>>   I think we are more or less feature complete at this point.
>
>> Well, a beta usually means feature complete, so...
>
> Devrim,
>
> Strk and I are on board.  Paul I think is traveling so hasn't given his two
> cents.
> Mark is probably on holiday.
>
> That said.  I've pushed all outstanding stuff to 2.2 that I don't think has
> a chance in hell of making 2.1
> in next week and I don't see evidence that it is actively being worked on .
> I suspect we'll be a tad bit later than 9.3beta1, but shooting for next week
> to close out the final things.
>
> Olivier is going to work on getting his cgal configure stuff in place this
> weekend. This will change more how you compile than anything and won't
> change your compiling unless you are building with the optional 3D stuff.
> So again I think this can slide past beta release if needed.
>
> And I've committed all outstanding patches or pushing them forward if I
> thought they were not good enough.
>
> What we are left with that aren't enhancements are listed here:
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/query?status=assigned&status=new&status=reopen
> ed&order=priority&col=id&col=summary&col=milestone&col=status&col=type&col=p
> riority&col=component&milestone=PostGIS+2.1.0&type=enhancement&type=patch
>
>
> The PAGC one I'm working on and is actually in place (just working out some
> kinks) but is really an extra (not part of core PostGIS).  ST_ColorMap I
> really want to see in 2.1  so am willing to bend the rules if we are okay
> with a beta release not having it. Besides Bborie is always fast about
> jumping on things so he might surprise me and get it in next week.
>
> Rest of stuff not listed are bug fixes that are truly bugs and won't change
> the user facing API so don't think are necessary for a beta release.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Regina
> http://www.postgis.us
> http://postgis.net
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel