[postgis-devel] License conflict between PostGIS core and raster

[Paul Ramsey]

As a PSC member, I'm +0. Not because I was GPLv3 but because of
annoyance that this became an issue to start w/.

P

On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Jorge Arevalo
<jorgearevalo at libregis.org> wrote:
> +1 for me, also as a developer, to relicense raster code as "GPL2 or later".
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Mateusz Loskot <mateusz at loskot.net> wrote:
>> On 21 October 2013 22:54, Bborie Park <dustymugs at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> It has come to my attention that the license of the raster component is
>>> GPL3+ while PostGIS core is GPL2 only. The licenses are not compatible and
>>> as a contributor to the raster component, I'd like to see the removal of
>>> this conflict.
>>>
>>> As for my opinion (for what it's worth), I'd like to see the raster
>>> component be relicensed to GPL2+ for 2.0, 2.1 and -trunk.
>>
>> +1 for me, as a developer (not in PSC) to relicense raster code as
>> "GPL2 or later"
>>
>> Best regards,
>> --
>> Mateusz  Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
>> _______________________________________________
>> postgis-devel mailing list
>> postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>
>
>
> --
> Jorge Arevalo
> Freelance developer
>
> http://about.me/jorgeas80
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel