[postgis-devel] PSC Vote: Drop Support for PostgreSQL 9.2 in PostGIS 2.4

Paul Ramsey pramsey at cleverelephant.ca
Thu May 25 15:58:14 PDT 2017


+1, that's a very old db, they can always stick w/ older postgis
P

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Bborie Park <dustymugs at gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Regina Obe <lr at pcorp.us> wrote:
>
>> Behavior changes in PostgreSQL 10 are forcing me to change some of the
>> raster functions.
>>
>> Namely this one though there may be others since a lot of raster
>> regression
>> tests are failing at the moment.
>>
>> https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/3760
>>
>> To fix the issue, I may resort to things like using LATERAL which was
>> introduced in PostgreSQL 9.3.
>>
>> Plus I just want to ditch PostgreSQL 9.2 so we can get rid of some 9.2
>> checks and not have to test it (we aren't testing it at the moment
>> anyway).
>>
>> I should also add, that PostgreSQL 9.2 is reaching EOL in September 2017
>>
>> 9.2     9.2.21  Yes     September 2012  September 2017
>>
>> https://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/
>>
>> Which is around the same time that PostgreSQL 10 is coming out, and the
>> time
>> I'd hope we'd be ready to release PostGIS 2.4.
>>
>>
>>
>> +1 to ditch PostgreSQL 9.2 for PostGIS 2.4
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Regina
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> postgis-devel mailing list
>> postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20170525/88bf0dd9/attachment.html>


More information about the postgis-devel mailing list