[postgis-devel] lwgeom_*_in_place()

[Paul Ramsey]

> On Oct 3, 2017, at 12:18 PM, Sandro Santilli <strk at kbt.io> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 07:24:40AM +0200, Björn Harrtell wrote:
> 
>> Is not returning void enough to indicate a function (that does something) mutates?
> 
> I think taking a non-const LWGEOM pointer should be enough.
> 
> I'm not enthusiast about adding thos 9 characters to each
> and every function.

Well, since we can’t to function over-loading, we’ll need to have *some* signature difference, have a shorter-yet-still-evocative suggestion?

P

> 
> --strk;
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel