[postgis-devel] PostGIS Code Sprint?

Brian M Hamlin maplabs at light42.com
Thu Jun 21 10:35:05 PDT 2018


Hi Steve -- feel like hacking on Ubuntu Linux OSGeoLive a bit ?

Our 'serious' packagers have not gotten SFCGAL in so far.. 
We are in alpha now.. will ship at FOSS4G Dar es Salaam
  best from Berkeley  --Brian
 

On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:32:08 +0300, Stephen Mather  wrote:

       Also: those Boston folx host a great code sprint. 

Stephen V. Mather +1 (216) 339-6347 (Signal, Telegram, Cell, and WhatsApp)

On Jun 21, 2018, at 20:29, Regina Obe  wrote:

       If we do Boston, I'd be happy to host at my place - great view :)
We can use some of the money to pay for hotel and plane accommodations 
and try to get some other sponsors too. 

Thanks,
Regina

       -----Original Message-----

       From: postgis-devel [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On

       Behalf Of Paul Ramsey

       Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 10:12 AM

       To: PostGIS Development Discussion

       Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] PostGIS Code Sprint?

       Well, we have, hiding in the archives somewhere, a nice long 
list of "big

       project" problems that maybe we want to dust off? But it doesn't 
have to be

       a big project necessarily. Could just be the impetus to finish 
some unfinished

       things (on my side, harmonizing the row-based output formats, or the

       internally indexed distance code) that need input from multiple folks. 

       P

       On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 6:32 AM, Daniel Baston

       wrote:

       Hi Paul,

       Sounds fun. Are you thinking of doing something to prepare for a 2.5

       release, or to kick off a larger project for 2.6? It would be great to

       tackle something thorny like the validity flag. 

       Dan

       On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 12:34 PM Paul Ramsey

       wrote:

       Hey devs,

       I just noticed a line item in the OSGeo budget... [1] I vaguely

       remember some discussion about getting our oar in when the call for

       budget items went out, I guess we put that oar in? Which brings me

       to: should we do this then? :) ATB, P

       [1] https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Budget_2018#Code_Sprints

       _______________________________________________

       postgis-devel mailing list

       postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org

       https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel

       _______________________________________________

       postgis-devel mailing list

       postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org

       https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel

       _______________________________________________

       postgis-devel mailing list

       postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org

       https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel

_______________________________________________
postgis-devel mailing list
postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel

-------------------------

_______________________________________________
postgis-devel mailing list
postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel

--
Brian M Hamlin
OSGeo California
blog.light42.com

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20180621/9b95c72c/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the postgis-devel mailing list