<HTML dir=ltr><HEAD><TITLE>Re: [postgis-devel] Issue 35 in postgis: Comments on Postgis Functions</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=unicode">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16674" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV id=idOWAReplyText98093 dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>Yes that is what I was thinking. Although I think we only need one definition in the docs. Not sure the easiest way to do that.</FONT></DIV></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><BR>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> postgis-devel-bounces@postgis.refractions.net on behalf of Kevin Neufeld<BR><B>Sent:</B> Sun 7/6/2008 11:51 AM<BR><B>To:</B> PostGIS Development Discussion<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [postgis-devel] Issue 35 in postgis: Comments on Postgis Functions<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV>
<P><FONT size=2>You mean having one doc entry for every overridden function definition? <BR>No problem here. I too think it would clarify things for users.<BR>-- Kevin<BR><BR>Obe, Regina wrote:<BR>><BR>> ...<BR>> Does anyone have issues with me changing the doc accordingly.<BR>> <BR>> Thanks,<BR>> Regina<BR>_______________________________________________<BR>postgis-devel mailing list<BR>postgis-devel@postgis.refractions.net<BR><A href="http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel">http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel</A><BR></FONT></P></DIV></BODY></HTML>
<HTML><BODY><P><hr size=1></P>
<P><STRONG>
The substance of this message, including any attachments, may be confidential, legally privileged and/or exempt from disclosure pursuant to Massachusetts law. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
</STRONG></P></BODY></HTML>
<P><hr size=1></P>
<P><STRONG><font size="2" color="339900"> Help make the earth a greener place. If at all possible resist printing this email and join us in saving paper. </p> <p> </font></STRONG></P>