<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7653.38">
<TITLE>RE: [postgis-devel] 1, dot, 3 dot 4!</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Wow deja vu. Are we going to have an RC2. We should have an RC2!<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: postgis-devel-bounces@postgis.refractions.net on behalf of Kevin Neufeld<BR>
Sent: Mon 10/20/2008 12:50 PM<BR>
To: PostGIS Development Discussion<BR>
Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] 1, dot, 3 dot 4!<BR>
<BR>
Ok, so after thinking about this some more, to avoid naming collisions<BR>
with autobuilds and tagging, I propose that instead of:<BR>
<BR>
1. update devel branch/trunk "Version.config" to tagged version.<BR>
2. create a tag release<BR>
3. revert "Version.config" in devel branch/trunk back to SVN version<BR>
<BR>
we follow this procedure:<BR>
<BR>
1. create a tag release<BR>
2. svn switch to tag release and update "Version.config" in the new<BR>
tagged release.<BR>
<BR>
I know it's not normal to commit to a tagged release, but updating the<BR>
version would be the *only* commit to the newly created tag.<BR>
<BR>
Doing things this way would simplify things in the autobuilding<BR>
department since nothing is changing in the devel branch - folks can<BR>
continue to happily commit without worries.<BR>
<BR>
Eventually, when 1.3.4 is tagged, branch would get updated to 1.3.5SVN<BR>
at the same time - naming collisions are still avoided.<BR>
<BR>
Thoughts?<BR>
-- Kevin<BR>
<BR>
Obe, Regina wrote:<BR>
> Paul,<BR>
><BR>
> Hmm - I just downloaded the<BR>
> <A HREF="http://postgis.refractions.net/download/postgis-1.3.4rc1.tar.gz">http://postgis.refractions.net/download/postgis-1.3.4rc1.tar.gz</A><BR>
><BR>
> and it has an inner folder<BR>
><BR>
> postgis-1.3.4svn<BR>
><BR>
> I suspect this may cause some people some confusion?<BR>
><BR>
> Why is the date listed as Oct 12th? I thought you released that just<BR>
> recently in the past day or so?<BR>
><BR>
> Thanks,<BR>
> Regina<BR>
> -----------------------------------------<BR>
> The substance of this message, including any attachments, may be<BR>
> confidential, legally privileged and/or exempt from disclosure<BR>
> pursuant to Massachusetts law. It is intended<BR>
> solely for the addressee. If you received this in error, please<BR>
> contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.<BR>
> _______________________________________________<BR>
> postgis-devel mailing list<BR>
> postgis-devel@postgis.refractions.net<BR>
> <A HREF="http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel">http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel</A><BR>
_______________________________________________<BR>
postgis-devel mailing list<BR>
postgis-devel@postgis.refractions.net<BR>
<A HREF="http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel">http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel</A><BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>