<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7653.38">
<TITLE>RE: [postgis-devel] Impatient on 1.3.4</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Mark,<BR>
Okay I stand corrected then. Push on. I guess we can wait a few more days. Maybe we can put a muzzle on Paul for the time being to keep him quiet :). <BR>
<BR>
Besides that will give me more time to throw additional function descriptions in the postgis_comments.sql and docs (well just the 1.4 for docs, I'm not going to bother with 1.3.4 except for the postgis_comments.sql) and also add the undocumented ones.<BR>
<BR>
It doesn't look like we have documented any of the circular string support functions (or I assume that is what they are)<BR>
<BR>
ST_HasArc, ST_LinetoCurve, ST_CurveToLine<BR>
<BR>
Are those working properly or should we wait off on documenting them.<BR>
<BR>
Thanks,<BR>
Regina<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: postgis-devel-bounces@postgis.refractions.net on behalf of Mark Cave-Ayland<BR>
Sent: Thu 10/30/2008 1:45 PM<BR>
To: PostGIS Development Discussion<BR>
Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] Impatient on 1.3.4<BR>
<BR>
Obe, Regina wrote:<BR>
> I agree with Paul. If the 15th digit on my GeoJSON output from my Linux<BR>
> doesn't agree with that of my Windows, I personally could care less. <BR>
> Seems like minutia.<BR>
<BR>
But this is not the case; Olivier submitted a patch for me to test which<BR>
fixes the decimal places within the regression tests, but he notes there<BR>
is still at least 1 failure. From Olivier's last email:<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On the other hand i'm not sure it will be enough,<BR>
there was on your previous regress diff,<BR>
differences on geojson bbox coordinates<BR>
<BR>
multiline_03|{"type":"MultiLineString","bbox":[3429562,5795363,3434296,5799491]...<BR>
versus<BR>
multiline_03|{"type":"MultiLineString","bbox":[3429563,5795363,3434296,5799491]...<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
So I would argue this still warrants further investigation.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
ATB,<BR>
<BR>
Mark.<BR>
<BR>
--<BR>
Mark Cave-Ayland<BR>
Sirius Corporation - The Open Source Experts<BR>
<A HREF="http://www.siriusit.co.uk">http://www.siriusit.co.uk</A><BR>
T: +44 870 608 0063<BR>
_______________________________________________<BR>
postgis-devel mailing list<BR>
postgis-devel@postgis.refractions.net<BR>
<A HREF="http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel">http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel</A><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>
<HTML><BODY><P><hr size=1></P>
<P><STRONG>
The substance of this message, including any attachments, may be confidential, legally privileged and/or exempt from disclosure pursuant to Massachusetts law. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
</STRONG></P></BODY></HTML>
<P><hr size=1></P>
<P><STRONG><font size="2" color="339900"> Help make the earth a greener place. If at all possible resist printing this email and join us in saving paper. </p> <p> </font></STRONG></P>