<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7654.12">
<TITLE>RE: [postgis-devel] WKT Raster: Bug tracking</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Pierre,<BR>
<BR>
>From what I recall. <BR>
<BR>
I think<BR>
<BR>
"once upon a time PostGIS used trac. Then<BR>
trac broke."<BR>
<BR>
Someone said "lets get together a stop gap bug tracker till<BR>
we get trac working again. there is google lets use it. Easy to setup." --<BR>
<BR>
Then we all forgot about trac.<BR>
<BR>
My memory could be wrong, but I think that's how it happened.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: postgis-devel-bounces@postgis.refractions.net on behalf of Pierre Racine<BR>
Sent: Fri 3/6/2009 2:20 PM<BR>
To: PostGIS Development Discussion<BR>
Subject: RE: [postgis-devel] WKT Raster: Bug tracking<BR>
<BR>
I would not go with trac unless:<BR>
<BR>
1) We know why PostGIS folks did not choose it. They must have a good reason. Anyone knows?<BR>
<BR>
2) They actually plan to move to trac<BR>
<BR>
If they accept WKT Raster in their Google code account, then maybe we can all move together some day. So there is no risk that we stay alone in our own system. I don't want to be alone :-(<BR>
<BR>
I just wait for god benediction. But who's god?<BR>
<BR>
Pierre<BR>
<BR>
>-----Original Message-----<BR>
>From: postgis-devel-bounces@postgis.refractions.net [<A HREF="mailto:postgis-devel-">mailto:postgis-devel-</A><BR>
>bounces@postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Mateusz Loskot<BR>
>Sent: 6 mars 2009 12:03<BR>
>To: PostGIS Development Discussion<BR>
>Subject: RE: [postgis-devel] WKT Raster: Bug tracking<BR>
><BR>
>Obe, Regina wrote:<BR>
>> > Perhaps there is one, personally I've found it very helpful to be<BR>
>> > able to link<BR>
>> > from bug reports directly to source code revision/file/line easily,<BR>
>> > as it is possible in Trac (i.e. see <A HREF="http://trac.osgeo.org/geos/">http://trac.osgeo.org/geos/</A>).<BR>
>> > Google Code lacks of such feature, so it requires more writing &<BR>
>> > time to deal with bugs.<BR>
>><BR>
>> Good point. At anyrate I would like to see both projects tracked<BR>
>> together so if we eventually move back to trac for tracking, then both<BR>
>> should be moved at the same time.<BR>
>><BR>
>> Or I suppose since WKTRaster is smaller at this point, it could start<BR>
>> off in trac and then we merge the core PostGIS into that trac.<BR>
><BR>
>Good point.<BR>
><BR>
>Best regards,<BR>
>--<BR>
>Mateusz Loskot<BR>
>Senior Programmer, Cadcorp<BR>
><A HREF="http://www.cadcorp.com">http://www.cadcorp.com</A><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
>For the sake of simplicity, perhaps Frank's preference will make life easier.<BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>
<HTML><BODY><P><hr size=1></P>
<P><STRONG>
The substance of this message, including any attachments, may be confidential, legally privileged and/or exempt from disclosure pursuant to Massachusetts law. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
</STRONG></P></BODY></HTML>
<P><hr size=1></P>
<P><STRONG><font size="2" color="339900"> Help make the earth a greener place. If at all possible resist printing this email and join us in saving paper. </p> <p> </font></STRONG></P>