<div>
OK, the docs-x.y are gone, docs remains.</div><div>p</div>
<div><div><br></div><div>-- </div><div>Paul Ramsey</div><div>http://cleverelephant.ca</div><div>http://postgis.net</div><div><br></div></div>
<p style="color: #A0A0A8;">On Thursday, January 31, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Paragon Corporation wrote:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" style="border-left-style:solid;border-width:1px;margin-left:0px;padding-left:10px;">
<span><div><div><div>Paul,</div><div><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div>Unfortunately on .net this is not available, you can only get to</div><div>documentation by a specific version. On .org this existed, which was</div><div>nice an terse.</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div>I think that having this on .net would eb nice, but in order to avoid</div><div>having the versions interleaved we should probably have</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div><a href="http://website/docs/ST_Intersects">http://website/docs/ST_Intersects</a></div><div><a href="http://website/docs-2.0/ST_Intersects">http://website/docs-2.0/ST_Intersects</a></div><div><a href="http://website/docs-1.5/ST_Intersects">http://website/docs-1.5/ST_Intersects</a></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div>On the physical drives I have left everything untouched, but have</div><div>added lines to apache config to make the above URL scheme work. If we</div><div>update all our links, I can remove the old scheme after that.</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Can we please change things back.</div><div><br></div><div>I'm okay with <a href="http://website/docs/ST_Intersects.html">http://website/docs/ST_Intersects.html</a></div><div>Though I'd rather not publicize it. To me that is just a convenience and</div><div>one I don't want search engines indexing since we deprecate function names</div><div>frequent enough for those kind of links to become broken.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>We never had those other permutations and I'd really rather we not start</div><div>now.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>The main issue I have is</div><div>1) Those don't have manual in the name and we have doxygen and may in the</div><div>future have workbooks and so forth that would rightfully fall under docs</div><div><br></div><div>2) It is on the same level with the rest of the site so can never be more or</div><div>less the same as the underlying structure, which is too much for my limited</div><div>memory to deal with.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Regina</div><div><a href="http://www.postgis.us">http://www.postgis.us</a></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>_______________________________________________</div><div>postgis-devel mailing list</div><div><a href="mailto:postgis-devel@lists.osgeo.org">postgis-devel@lists.osgeo.org</a></div><div><a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel">http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel</a></div></div></div></span>
</blockquote>
<div>
<br>
</div>