<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"
data-hsystem="true"><style>p{margin: 0;padding: 0;}</style></head><body><p>I
tried to write out the context clearly
here.. </p><p><br></p><p> http://trac.osgeo.org/geos/wiki/PackageQuestion</p><p><br></p><p>--</p><p>Brian
M Hamlin</p><p>OSGeo California Chapter</p><p><br>On Thu, 30 May 2013 20:11:39
-0400, Paragon Corporation <lr@pcorp.us> wrote:<br><br>
> <br>
> <br>
> > I'd guess that this wouldn't be a problem for 2.1 since that
version<br>
> requires GEOS 3.4. As for 2.0, can we require a specific GEOS <br>
> > version for a minor version of PostGIS? Such as 2.0.4 requires GEOS
3.4?<br>
> <br>
> > -bborie<br>
> <br>
> Hmm I wanted 2.1 to require 3.4.0 but I think I lost that argument. <br>
> <br>
>
http://postgis.net/docs/manual-dev/postgis_installation.html#install_require<br>
> ments<br>
> <br>
> Nope some people thought it a good idea to support 3.3 and leave out a
good<br>
> chunk of functionaltiy.<br>
> <br>
> Thanks,<br>
> Regina<br>
> http://www.postgis.us<br>
> http://postgis.net<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> postgis-devel mailing list<br>
> postgis-devel@lists.osgeo.org<br>
> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel<br>
> <br>
> <br><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p></body></html>