<html>
<head>
</head>
<body><br />
I think you are right Paul.
<div>That would make it possible to use also on PostGIS 2.0 and 2.1 and also possible to release more frequent in the beginning.</div>
<div><br />
</div>
<div>I also realize that the interest from the client libraries is smaller than I had hoped. So it would be stupid to put code in PostGIS that won't be used.</div>
<div><br />
</div>
<div>To get things fast I think some javascript guru need to look at the client part and connect the parsing very close to the canvas drawing, to avoid all text based javascript objects. </div>
<div><br />
</div>
<div>/Nicklas</div> 2013-06-13 Paul Ramsey wrote:<br />
<br />
There's no great harm in including it, but it's more code to maintain that is pretty prospective. Why not bundle up an extension against PostGIS? I was pleased with how easy it was to do pointcloud_postgis as an extension that depended on both. <br />
><br />
>P <br />
><br />
>-- <br />
>Paul Ramsey<br />
>http://cleverelephant.ca<br />
>http://postgis.net<br />
><br />
><br />
>On Monday, June 10, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Nicklas Avén wrote:<br />
><br />
>> So, what i would like to ask is if PostGIS PSC and dev community can<br />
>> decide that TWKB will be included when it is ready?<br />
><br />
><br />
><br />
><br />
>
</body>
</html>