<html><head><style>body{font-family:Helvetica,Arial;font-size:13px}</style></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div id="bloop_customfont" style="font-family:Helvetica,Arial;font-size:13px; color: rgba(0,0,0,1.0); margin: 0px; line-height: auto;">On October 13, 2015 at 4:56:14 AM, Nicklas Avén (<a href="mailto:nicklas.aven@jordogskog.no">nicklas.aven@jordogskog.no</a>) wrote:</div> <blockquote type="cite" class="clean_bq"><span><div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: helvetica; font-size: 13px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;">My question is if there is no good alternatives to GitHub when it comes to git (like not propriety host)?</div></div></span></blockquote> <div id="bloop_sign_1444737407812473088" class="bloop_sign"><div><br></div><div>This isn’t a question that should be addressed technically, but one that is easily addressed culturally: yeah, github is where all the persons is. There’s a big advantage to running our development there from a talent acquisition and contribution management point of view. But for the usual FSF reasons we’re going to as usual take our medicine without the spoonful of sugar.</div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLkp_Dx6VdI&t=0m21s">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLkp_Dx6VdI&t=0m21s</a></div><div> </div><div>P.</div><div><br></div><span style="font-family:helvetica,arial;font-size:13px"></span>-- <br><span>http://postgis.net</span><div><span>http://cleverelephant.ca</span></div><div><br></div></div></body></html>