<html>
<head>
</head>
<body>
<div><br />
</div>Will OSGeo be with svn and trac in the future?
<div>Or is there any discussions there?</div>
<div><br />
</div>
<div>What about PostgreSQLs git repositories? They don't have "a special place" for extensions?</div>
<div><br />
</div>
<div>My question is if there is no good alternatives to GitHub when it comes to git (like not propriety host)?</div>
<div><br />
</div>
<div><br />
</div>
<div>/Nicklas<br />
<br />
2015-10-13 skrev Sandro Santilli :<br />
<br />
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 04:19:42AM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:<br />
><br />
>> If we’re going to spend the time processing trac entries to match git,<br />
>> why not spend the time migrating them to github and be done w/ it?<br />
><br />
>That'd mean also asking all PostGIS contributors to get an account on<br />
>a priorietary platform, rather than using the "OSGeo" account to<br />
>partecipate in the development of a full free software gis stack.<br />
><br />
>Sure it's tempting to just move to a system that, today, works faster<br />
>and is better maintained than the OSGeo infrastructure, but I'd still<br />
>prefer to stick with the official source being on OSGeo.<br />
><br />
>We're looking at various options to make it even unnecessary to<br />
>process trac entries to match git (by keeping multiple repositories).<br />
><br />
>--strk;<br />
>_______________________________________________<br />
>postgis-devel mailing list<br />
>postgis-devel@lists.osgeo.org<br />
>http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel<br />
><br />
>
</div>
</body>
</html>