<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>+1 for GEOS 3.6 upgrade, SFCGAL 1.3.1+<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>Pramsey I think already more or less approved.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>strk, dustymugs – have any dissenting opinion or you on board?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div style='border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt'><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'> postgis-devel [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces@lists.osgeo.org] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Darafei "Kom?pa" Praliaskouski<br><b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, December 04, 2018 5:34 AM<br><b>To:</b> PostGIS Development Discussion <postgis-devel@lists.osgeo.org><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [postgis-devel] Bumping dependencies versions for PostGIS 3.0<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Thanks.<o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>I cleaned up < Postgres 9.5 code in trunk:<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><a href="https://github.com/postgis/postgis/commit/06eebf5bc3a7bd36cb0ada3ea6512856073999f2">https://github.com/postgis/postgis/commit/06eebf5bc3a7bd36cb0ada3ea6512856073999f2</a> <br><br>Created a ticket to bump:<br><a href="https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/4268">https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/4268</a> SFCGAL to 1.3.1.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><a href="https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/4267">https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/4267</a> GEOS to 3.6.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></div></div></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 8:34 PM Sebastiaan Couwenberg <<a href="mailto:sebastic@xs4all.nl">sebastic@xs4all.nl</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in'><p class=MsoNormal>On 12/2/18 6:10 PM, Regina Obe wrote:<br>> The BSDs I think are all around 3.6, and FWIW on the Bessies they are<br>> running 3.6 which is latest stable.<br><br>FreeBSD has 3.6.3, see:<br><br> <a href="https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/graphics/geos/" target="_blank">https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/graphics/geos/</a><br><br>OpenBSD has 3.7.0, see:<br><br> <a href="http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/geo/geos/" target="_blank">http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/geo/geos/</a><br><br>NetBSD has 3.7.1, see:<br><br> <a href="http://pkgsrc.se/geography/geos" target="_blank">http://pkgsrc.se/geography/geos</a><br><br>> Macs I have no clue what they do – seems all over the place.<br><br>MacPorts has 3.7.0, see:<br><br> <a href="https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/tree/master/science/geos" target="_blank">https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/tree/master/science/geos</a><br><br>Homebrew has 3.7.0, see:<br><br> <a href="https://formulae.brew.sh/formula/geos" target="_blank">https://formulae.brew.sh/formula/geos</a><br><br>> Trusty is on its last legs so not too concerned about that and it was<br>> already screwed with our 3.5 upgrade on 2.5 anyway. Xenial I'm a<br>> little concerned about (and I think the reason we didn't bump to 3.6<br>> in 2.5), but probably when we swing out 3.7, xenial will be on its<br>> last legs as well so of low concern. That would still leave bionic and<br>> cosmic stuck on 3.6, which we don't want to screw.<br><br>trusty is supported until April 2019.<br><br>xenial is supported until April 2021.<br><br>bionic is supported until April 2023.<br><br>trusty is really showing its age, many recent releases of projects have<br>issues with its outdated packages. I also wouldn't worry too much about it.<br><br>xenial also lacks some things, but is not as bad as trusty.<br><br>Everyone who want to build recent releases on Ubuntu LTS should be using<br>bionic.<br><br>I also wouldn't worry about non-LTS releases, as they are only supported<br> for less than a year.<br><br>Kind Regards,<br><br>Bas<br><br>-- <br> GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1<br>Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1<br>_______________________________________________<br>postgis-devel mailing list<br><a href="mailto:postgis-devel@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">postgis-devel@lists.osgeo.org</a><br><a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel</a><o:p></o:p></p></blockquote></div><p class=MsoNormal><br clear=all><o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal>-- <o:p></o:p></p><div><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Darafei Praliaskouski<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Support me: <a href="http://patreon.com/komzpa" target="_blank">http://patreon.com/komzpa</a><o:p></o:p></p></div></div></div></div></div></div></body></html>