<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72"><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>Yah if we can find a free-for-OSS plan that would be great or go back to good old log processing using something like awstats, grafana, or munin. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>I do wonder though how misleading the below stats are aside from the documentation stats.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>The documentations stats tell us what people are mostly using., but the ones that come up at the top are predictable. I can tell that just by looking at past days of logs.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>The 2019 uptick I think was an infrastructure change so not a true reflection of traffic changing.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>There is just so much that is drowned out now by other sources, it is really hard to get a clear picture looking at stats of our website or popularity.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>e.g Most people get their PostGIS from package maintainers, docker, or DbaaS. On top of that DbaaS have largely forked our docs, so I suspect people don’t even come to our site for docs as much as they used to. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>The desktop / mobile difference I am surprised. I would have expected more mobile, but then again if I’m a new user looking at postgis, it’s probably to look at the manual or when I’m at work and so I wouldn’t be using my phone for that. It’s not like twitter / facebook where I just want to blow away an hour of time while I’m waiting on some line.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>Thanks,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>Regina<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div style='border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt'><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'> postgis-devel [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces@lists.osgeo.org] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Paul Ramsey<br><b>Sent:</b> Friday, March 4, 2022 12:45 PM<br><b>To:</b> PostGIS Development Discussion <postgis-devel@lists.osgeo.org><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [postgis-devel] Website Redo change to Hugo<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Losing analytics just means losing another data point on project popularity. Not that we're making good use of the data points we have now...<o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>About 100,000 sessions per month.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>A large amount of Chinese traffic, our second biggest language and second biggest country too.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>About 3500 active users per day.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>About 10000 pages views per day.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Most popular 2nd level page: /install<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>90% of users still on desktop, 9% mobile, 1% tablet<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>On the one hand... I never look and never share these stats. On the other... they are kind of useful in thinking about what to work on in the web presence, and without analytics we wouldn't have them. Maybe there's a non-google analytics SaaS with a free-for-OSS plan we can plug into so that, even if we are gathering web stats we are at least not doing it into the maw of a huge cross-linker and leverager.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>P.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><img width=653 height=347 id=B6C470D5-F0D3-4FD6-BBD1-613495D2BDF9 src="cid:image001.png@01D82FD0.1DEF8890"><img width=613 height=319 id="_x0034_C14E6F0-42D7-4D98-868E-54D61983E155" src="cid:image002.png@01D82FD0.1DEF8890"><img width=1066 height=496 id="_x0037_3793B2A-FD76-42DA-8289-6F2D7D7D3982" src="cid:image003.png@01D82FD0.1DEF8890"><img width=1052 height=275 id="_x0031_B9A2346-C47E-44C3-A11B-8C5FB3BD123A" src="cid:image004.png@01D82FD0.1DEF8890"><o:p></o:p></p></div></div></div></body></html>