<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">The strategy thing starts to get messy because each strategy has its own parameterization. Some need a tolerance, some need a K, some need a minpoints, etc). In some ways just having a lot of function sigs is cleaner. Each gets its own docs page, can completely explain its parameters, and have relevant examples and results.<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">P<br class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Feb 24, 2023, at 10:53 AM, Darafei Komяpa Praliaskouski <<a href="mailto:me@komzpa.net" class="">me@komzpa.net</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="auto" class="">Yay!<div dir="auto" class=""><br class=""></div><div dir="auto" class="">The "Win" part is not very pretty though. Do you think we can get it into maybe something like ST_Cluster(geom, strategy:='intersecting/within/dbscan/kmeans/xmeans/...')? I believe set of other configuration options is not too wide between the methods. </div></div><br class=""><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">пт, 24 лют 2023, 22:41 карыстальнік Paul Ramsey <<a href="mailto:pramsey@cleverelephant.ca" class="">pramsey@cleverelephant.ca</a>> напісаў:<br class=""></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word;line-break:after-white-space" class=""><div class="">Martin and I have repeatedly said “it would be nice if all the clustering functionality was available as windowing functions”, and here I have finally gone and added that in. This adds ST_ClusterIntersectingWin and ST_ClusterWithinWin, as windowing analogues to ST_ClusterIntersecting and ST_ClusterWithin</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><a href="https://github.com/postgis/postgis/pull/721" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" class="">https://github.com/postgis/postgis/pull/721</a><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Unfortunately for backwards compatibility we can’t (I think) just yank and replace the existing functions in favour of the windowing ones, even though I think most people will vastly prefer windowing as an approach to cluster functionality.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">P</div></div>_______________________________________________<br class="">
postgis-devel mailing list<br class="">
<a href="mailto:postgis-devel@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" class="">postgis-devel@lists.osgeo.org</a><br class="">
<a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel</a><br class="">
</blockquote></div>
_______________________________________________<br class="">postgis-devel mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:postgis-devel@lists.osgeo.org" class="">postgis-devel@lists.osgeo.org</a><br class="">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>