<html><head></head><body><div class="ydp6d500bc4yahoo-style-wrap" style="font-family:Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:16px;"><div id="ydp6d500bc4yiv2003176421"><div><div style="font-family:Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:16px;" class="ydp6d500bc4yiv2003176421yahoo-style-wrap"><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">Hi latot here, to construct new TopoGeometries using other TopoGeometries we need to convert to TopoElements, make an array with them, I think would be ver nice have functions to instead work with TopoElements work directly with TopoGeometries.</div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><br></div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">The functions I have in mind that could be useful would be the next ones:</div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><br></div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">CreateTopoGeometry, aggregate function for TopoGeoemtries and TopoElements</div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><br></div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">An Array type for TopoGeoemtries.</div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><br></div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><br></div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">At some point, maybe would be useful have array_agg as input for TopoElements and TopoGeometries? I'm not sure because PG transform this ones to Strings, and would be confusing.</div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><br></div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">One reason of why use TopoGeometries is that we can check the input TopoGeometries are childs of the layer we are using, so is safer than use TopoElements.</div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><br></div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">What do you think?<br></div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><br></div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">Thx!<br></div></div></div></div></div></body></html>