<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Aptos;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple style='word-wrap:break-word'><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>Yes we have a lot of stuff to release even for 3.0<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><a href="https://gitea.osgeo.org/postgis/postgis/src/branch/stable-3.0/NEWS">https://gitea.osgeo.org/postgis/postgis/src/branch/stable-3.0/NEWS</a><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>So I’d do a final release of all of those we EOL and mark them as EOL.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>I’d feel comfortable going as far back as 3.3 but I wouldn’t want to EOL 3.4.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Paul it says in 3.4, you put in support for PG19? So I presume the notes are wrong that 3.4 actually supports at very least 12-18 instead of 12-17<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><a href="https://gitea.osgeo.org/postgis/postgis/src/branch/stable-3.4/NEWS">https://gitea.osgeo.org/postgis/postgis/src/branch/stable-3.4/NEWS</a><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div style='border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt'><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'> Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski <me@komzpa.net> <br><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, November 26, 2025 4:47 AM<br><b>To:</b> Laurențiu Nicola <lnicola@dend.ro><br><b>Cc:</b> PostGIS Development Discussion <postgis-devel@lists.osgeo.org><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: PSC Vote: Drop PostGIS 3.0<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>+1 from Darafei to drop 3.0, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4. (feel free to reuse this vote in future if we drop not all of them this time). <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Do we have something to release in those branches now?<o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 9:34<span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'> </span>AM Laurențiu Nicola <<a href="mailto:lnicola@dend.ro" target="_blank">lnicola@dend.ro</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in'><p class=MsoNormal>Does this let us clean up anything else (support for EOL Postgres 12-13 or old GEOS), or is it mostly to reduce the backporting effort for fixes?<o:p></o:p></p></blockquote><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>It's less about backporting efforts and more to control the expectation if bugs are going to get fixed in this iteration.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>For Postgres and GEOS there is usually a separate vote, when someone decides to double-check what is bundled nowadays in popular distros (Ubu/Deb/RH) and what's become obsolete to lift up the horizon.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in'><p class=MsoNormal><br>Laurentiu<br><br>On Wed, Nov 26, 2025, at 01:27, Regina Obe wrote:<br>> I think it's about time to say bye bye to PostGIS 3.0.<br>><br>> I'd like to say bye bye to PostGIS 3.1, but feels kinda dirty to drop 2<br>> versions in one go.<br>><br>> Thoughts?<br>><br>> +1 for dropping PostGIS 3.0<o:p></o:p></p></blockquote></div></div></div></div></div></body></html>