[postgis-tickets] [PostGIS] #2949: Memory leaks test_mindistance2d_tolerance
PostGIS
trac at osgeo.org
Wed Oct 1 06:31:23 PDT 2014
#2949: Memory leaks test_mindistance2d_tolerance
---------------------+------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: strk | Owner: pramsey
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: medium | Milestone: PostGIS 2.2.0
Component: postgis | Version: trunk
Keywords: |
---------------------+------------------------------------------------------
Valgrind reports leaks in the mindistance2d tester
{{{
==1146== HEAP SUMMARY:
==1146== in use at exit: 17,024 bytes in 146 blocks
==1146== total heap usage: 64,242 allocs, 64,096 frees, 4,456,055 bytes
allocated
==1146==
==1146== 120 (32 direct, 88 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely
lost in loss record 83 of 114
==1146== at 0x4C2AB80: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-
amd64-linux.so)
==1146== by 0x4E58D19: lwcircstring_construct (lwcircstring.c:52)
==1146== by 0x4E63344: wkt_parser_circularstring_new (lwin_wkt.c:394)
==1146== by 0x4E605CF: wkt_yyparse (lwin_wkt_parse.y:443)
==1146== by 0x4E6136D: lwgeom_parse_wkt (lwin_wkt_parse.y:68)
==1146== by 0x4E64165: lwgeom_from_wkt (lwin_wkt.c:848)
==1146== by 0x4181A5: do_type_test (cu_force_sfs.c:42)
==1146== by 0x418242: test_sqlmm (cu_force_sfs.c:54)
==1146== by 0x50A3C99: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x50A3F27: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x50A42A5: CU_run_all_tests (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x40550F: main (cu_tester.c:144)
==1146==
==1146== 144 (8 direct, 136 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely
lost in loss record 86 of 114
==1146== at 0x4C2AB80: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-
amd64-linux.so)
==1146== by 0x4E597B1: lwcurvepoly_construct_from_lwpoly
(lwcurvepoly.c:50)
==1146== by 0x4E4E6EE: lw_dist2d_poly_curvepoly (measures.c:906)
==1146== by 0x4E4DE5C: lw_dist2d_recursive (measures.c:345)
==1146== by 0x4E4E1D6: lwgeom_mindistance2d_tolerance (measures.c:205)
==1146== by 0x414241: do_test_mindistance2d_tolerance
(cu_measures.c:55)
==1146== by 0x4145C7: test_mindistance2d_tolerance (cu_measures.c:166)
==1146== by 0x50A3C99: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x50A3F27: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x50A42A5: CU_run_all_tests (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x40550F: main (cu_tester.c:144)
==1146==
==1146== 144 (8 direct, 136 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely
lost in loss record 87 of 114
==1146== at 0x4C2AB80: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-
amd64-linux.so)
==1146== by 0x4E597B1: lwcurvepoly_construct_from_lwpoly
(lwcurvepoly.c:50)
==1146== by 0x4E4E6EE: lw_dist2d_poly_curvepoly (measures.c:906)
==1146== by 0x4E4DE5C: lw_dist2d_recursive (measures.c:345)
==1146== by 0x4E4E1D6: lwgeom_mindistance2d_tolerance (measures.c:205)
==1146== by 0x414241: do_test_mindistance2d_tolerance
(cu_measures.c:55)
==1146== by 0x4145DF: test_mindistance2d_tolerance (cu_measures.c:167)
==1146== by 0x50A3C99: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x50A3F27: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x50A42A5: CU_run_all_tests (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x40550F: main (cu_tester.c:144)
==1146==
==1146== 144 (8 direct, 136 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely
lost in loss record 88 of 114
==1146== at 0x4C2AB80: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-
amd64-linux.so)
==1146== by 0x4E597B1: lwcurvepoly_construct_from_lwpoly
(lwcurvepoly.c:50)
==1146== by 0x4E4E6EE: lw_dist2d_poly_curvepoly (measures.c:906)
==1146== by 0x4E4DE5C: lw_dist2d_recursive (measures.c:345)
==1146== by 0x4E4E1D6: lwgeom_mindistance2d_tolerance (measures.c:205)
==1146== by 0x414241: do_test_mindistance2d_tolerance
(cu_measures.c:55)
==1146== by 0x414647: test_mindistance2d_tolerance (cu_measures.c:180)
==1146== by 0x50A3C99: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x50A3F27: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x50A42A5: CU_run_all_tests (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x40550F: main (cu_tester.c:144)
==1146==
==1146== 144 (8 direct, 136 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely
lost in loss record 89 of 114
==1146== at 0x4C2AB80: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-
amd64-linux.so)
==1146== by 0x4E597B1: lwcurvepoly_construct_from_lwpoly
(lwcurvepoly.c:50)
==1146== by 0x4E4E6EE: lw_dist2d_poly_curvepoly (measures.c:906)
==1146== by 0x4E4DE5C: lw_dist2d_recursive (measures.c:345)
==1146== by 0x4E4E1D6: lwgeom_mindistance2d_tolerance (measures.c:205)
==1146== by 0x414241: do_test_mindistance2d_tolerance
(cu_measures.c:55)
==1146== by 0x4146C3: test_mindistance2d_tolerance (cu_measures.c:185)
==1146== by 0x50A3C99: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x50A3F27: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x50A42A5: CU_run_all_tests (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x40550F: main (cu_tester.c:144)
==1146==
==1146== 216 (8 direct, 208 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely
lost in loss record 90 of 114
==1146== at 0x4C2AB80: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-
amd64-linux.so)
==1146== by 0x4E597B1: lwcurvepoly_construct_from_lwpoly
(lwcurvepoly.c:50)
==1146== by 0x4E4E6EE: lw_dist2d_poly_curvepoly (measures.c:906)
==1146== by 0x4E4DE5C: lw_dist2d_recursive (measures.c:345)
==1146== by 0x4E4E1D6: lwgeom_mindistance2d_tolerance (measures.c:205)
==1146== by 0x414241: do_test_mindistance2d_tolerance
(cu_measures.c:55)
==1146== by 0x4145AF: test_mindistance2d_tolerance (cu_measures.c:165)
==1146== by 0x50A3C99: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x50A3F27: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x50A42A5: CU_run_all_tests (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x40550F: main (cu_tester.c:144)
==1146==
==1146== 216 (8 direct, 208 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely
lost in loss record 91 of 114
==1146== at 0x4C2AB80: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-
amd64-linux.so)
==1146== by 0x4E597B1: lwcurvepoly_construct_from_lwpoly
(lwcurvepoly.c:50)
==1146== by 0x4E4E6EE: lw_dist2d_poly_curvepoly (measures.c:906)
==1146== by 0x4E4DE5C: lw_dist2d_recursive (measures.c:345)
==1146== by 0x4E4E1D6: lwgeom_mindistance2d_tolerance (measures.c:205)
==1146== by 0x414241: do_test_mindistance2d_tolerance
(cu_measures.c:55)
==1146== by 0x41462F: test_mindistance2d_tolerance (cu_measures.c:179)
==1146== by 0x50A3C99: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x50A3F27: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x50A42A5: CU_run_all_tests (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x40550F: main (cu_tester.c:144)
==1146==
==1146== 216 (8 direct, 208 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely
lost in loss record 92 of 114
==1146== at 0x4C2AB80: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-
amd64-linux.so)
==1146== by 0x4E597B1: lwcurvepoly_construct_from_lwpoly
(lwcurvepoly.c:50)
==1146== by 0x4E4E6EE: lw_dist2d_poly_curvepoly (measures.c:906)
==1146== by 0x4E4DE5C: lw_dist2d_recursive (measures.c:345)
==1146== by 0x4E4E1D6: lwgeom_mindistance2d_tolerance (measures.c:205)
==1146== by 0x414241: do_test_mindistance2d_tolerance
(cu_measures.c:55)
==1146== by 0x41465F: test_mindistance2d_tolerance (cu_measures.c:181)
==1146== by 0x50A3C99: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x50A3F27: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x50A42A5: CU_run_all_tests (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x40550F: main (cu_tester.c:144)
==1146==
==1146== 216 (8 direct, 208 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely
lost in loss record 93 of 114
==1146== at 0x4C2AB80: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-
amd64-linux.so)
==1146== by 0x4E597B1: lwcurvepoly_construct_from_lwpoly
(lwcurvepoly.c:50)
==1146== by 0x4E4E6EE: lw_dist2d_poly_curvepoly (measures.c:906)
==1146== by 0x4E4DE5C: lw_dist2d_recursive (measures.c:345)
==1146== by 0x4E4E1D6: lwgeom_mindistance2d_tolerance (measures.c:205)
==1146== by 0x414241: do_test_mindistance2d_tolerance
(cu_measures.c:55)
==1146== by 0x414677: test_mindistance2d_tolerance (cu_measures.c:182)
==1146== by 0x50A3C99: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x50A3F27: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x50A42A5: CU_run_all_tests (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x40550F: main (cu_tester.c:144)
==1146==
==1146== 216 (8 direct, 208 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely
lost in loss record 94 of 114
==1146== at 0x4C2AB80: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-
amd64-linux.so)
==1146== by 0x4E597B1: lwcurvepoly_construct_from_lwpoly
(lwcurvepoly.c:50)
==1146== by 0x4E4E6EE: lw_dist2d_poly_curvepoly (measures.c:906)
==1146== by 0x4E4DE5C: lw_dist2d_recursive (measures.c:345)
==1146== by 0x4E4E1D6: lwgeom_mindistance2d_tolerance (measures.c:205)
==1146== by 0x414241: do_test_mindistance2d_tolerance
(cu_measures.c:55)
==1146== by 0x414693: test_mindistance2d_tolerance (cu_measures.c:183)
==1146== by 0x50A3C99: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x50A3F27: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x50A42A5: CU_run_all_tests (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x40550F: main (cu_tester.c:144)
==1146==
==1146== 216 (8 direct, 208 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely
lost in loss record 95 of 114
==1146== at 0x4C2AB80: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-
amd64-linux.so)
==1146== by 0x4E597B1: lwcurvepoly_construct_from_lwpoly
(lwcurvepoly.c:50)
==1146== by 0x4E4E6EE: lw_dist2d_poly_curvepoly (measures.c:906)
==1146== by 0x4E4DE5C: lw_dist2d_recursive (measures.c:345)
==1146== by 0x4E4E1D6: lwgeom_mindistance2d_tolerance (measures.c:205)
==1146== by 0x414241: do_test_mindistance2d_tolerance
(cu_measures.c:55)
==1146== by 0x4146AB: test_mindistance2d_tolerance (cu_measures.c:184)
==1146== by 0x50A3C99: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x50A3F27: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x50A42A5: CU_run_all_tests (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x40550F: main (cu_tester.c:144)
==1146==
==1146== 216 (8 direct, 208 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely
lost in loss record 96 of 114
==1146== at 0x4C2AB80: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-
amd64-linux.so)
==1146== by 0x4E597B1: lwcurvepoly_construct_from_lwpoly
(lwcurvepoly.c:50)
==1146== by 0x4E4E6EE: lw_dist2d_poly_curvepoly (measures.c:906)
==1146== by 0x4E4DE5C: lw_dist2d_recursive (measures.c:345)
==1146== by 0x4E4E1D6: lwgeom_mindistance2d_tolerance (measures.c:205)
==1146== by 0x414241: do_test_mindistance2d_tolerance
(cu_measures.c:55)
==1146== by 0x4146DF: test_mindistance2d_tolerance (cu_measures.c:186)
==1146== by 0x50A3C99: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x50A3F27: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x50A42A5: CU_run_all_tests (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
==1146== by 0x40550F: main (cu_tester.c:144)
}}}
I hadn't tested 2.1
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/2949>
PostGIS <http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/>
The PostGIS Trac is used for bug, enhancement & task tracking, a user and developer wiki, and a view into the subversion code repository of PostGIS project.
More information about the postgis-tickets
mailing list