[postgis-users] postgis on fedora ...

Sandeep Kumar Jakkaraju sandeepkumar.jakkaraju at gmail.com
Sun Nov 26 10:58:28 PST 2006


Thanks Mike ...

I am sorry .. that i did not even check my results ...

I am able to do my work with INTERSECTS(geom,geom)...
but with CONTAINS(geom,geom) i dont get any results ..

If you want i can re post this in different thread !!??

Thanks
Regards
sandeep

On 11/26/06, Michael Fuhr <mike at fuhr.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 11:21:03PM +0530, Sandeep Kumar Jakkaraju wrote:
> > Thanx for your reply ...but my geometry has 5 points ..
> > please see the attached file ..
>
> The polygons in the first half of the file (lines 1-48) don't have
> five points but rather five rings, each with one point.  The first
> one is:
>
> POLYGON((0 0),(280 0),(280 280),(0 280),(0 0))
>
> The polygons in the second half of the file (lines 49-96) appear
> to be duplicates of those in the first half, but with one ring of
> five points:
>
> POLYGON((0 0,280 0,280 280,0 280,0 0))
>
> > I get all the polygons for isvalid() and also for NOT isvalid() ...
>
> Are you sure?  Or are you getting the 48 good polygons (one ring
> of five points) for isvalid() and the 48 bad polygons (five rings
> of one point each) for NOT isvalid()?
>
> --
> Michael Fuhr
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-users mailing list
> postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>



-- 
Sandeep Kumar Jakkaraju
WeBlog:
http://jakkarajus.blogspot.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-users/attachments/20061127/1a2178d1/attachment.html>


More information about the postgis-users mailing list