[postgis-users] Whew

[Paragon Corporation]

Not included at the moment.  Would require putting an entry in the
loader_generate_tables and also companion structures for each table in tiger
schema and mostly a lot of testing
mostly because census seems to like to change field names etc. every year.
 
It's something we've thought about just adding these common entries, but
having them possibly disabled by default so people could choose to load them
if they wanted.
 
If you are interested you can put in a ticket:
 
http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/
 
And mark it under tiger geocoder and version 2.1.
 
We don't plan to make any more changes (aside from major bug fixes) to the
tiger_2010 (pacakged with 2.0)  since tiger_2011 is already vastly different
and more efficient in the way it loads and the client that is funding most
of our work on tiger geocoder is using the tiger_2011 one packaged with
PostGIS 2.1 (though using it on a PostGIS 2.0 database)
 
Thanks,
Regina and Leo
http://www.postgis.us
 



  _____  

From: postgis-users-bounces at postgis.refractions.net
[mailto:postgis-users-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Eric
Aspengren
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 11:20 AM
To: PostGIS Users Discussion
Subject: [postgis-users] Whew


Ok, so, I've finally gotten a functional geocoder up and running. 

Has anyone had any luck using the scripts provided to load other Tiger files
(Congressional Districts, Statehouse Districts, Etc.)?


-- 
Eric Aspengren
(402) 478-VOTE
ericaspen at gmail.com


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-users/attachments/20120713/e1e7be46/attachment.html>