[postgis-users] ST_IsValid behaviour

Paolo Cavallini cavallini at faunalia.it
Wed Feb 14 11:46:46 PST 2018


Thanks Daniel, so it's a question of interpretation of specs.
Any opinions about multiple self intersections?
All the best.

Il 14/02/2018 20:22, Daniel Baston ha scritto:
> Hi Paolo,
> 
> I've encountered differing opinions on the validity of repeated
> vertices. The ticket linked below summarizes the "invalid" argument, and
> includes a link to the "valid" argument:
> https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/3425
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it
> <mailto:cavallini at faunalia.it>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi all,
>     we noticed two strange things in the behaviour of ST_IsValid:
>     * repeated vertices are not considered invalid
>     * in case of multiple intersections on a same polygon, only the first
>     one is reported.
>     Is there an explanation for this?
>     Thanks.
>     --
>     Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu <http://www.faunalia.eu>
>     QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
>     <http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html>
>     https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis
>     <https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis>
>     _______________________________________________
>     postgis-users mailing list
>     postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org>
>     https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>     <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-users mailing list
> postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
> 


-- 
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis


More information about the postgis-users mailing list