<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]>
<style>
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style>
<![endif]-->
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:Arial;
color:navy;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=blue>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>MySQL is nice, but they have only
partially implemented their spatial support at this time. PostGIS is far more
robust in terms of spatial analysis and operations. For instance, MySQL doesn’t
have any sql keywords such as Intersects or Overlaps yet, and doesn’t
support transactional spatial tables. You are better off going with PostGIS
now but keep an eye on MySQL because it looks promising for the future (a year
or two).<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Martin<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<div>
<div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><font size=3
face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>
<hr size=2 width="100%" align=center tabindex=-1>
</span></font></div>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><font size=2 face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold'>From:</span></font></b><font size=2
face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'> postgis-users-bounces@postgis.refractions.net
[mailto:postgis-users-bounces@postgis.refractions.net] <b><span
style='font-weight:bold'>On Behalf Of </span></b>Parang Saraf<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span></b> Tuesday, May 09, 2006 10:08
AM<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>To:</span></b>
postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span></b> [postgis-users] comparing
Mysql spatial extension with postgis</span></font><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'>hello,<br>
<br>
I am relatively new in this field. I am designing a database to store the
events extracted from the oceans. This project later demands of publishing data
on web. I am not able to decide which database to use. Mysql with spatial
extension or the postgis one. I would prefer to use <b><span style='font-weight:
bold'>windows platform</span></b>. <br>
<br>
Can someone suggest or can provide me with some links that compare the two
databases. <br>
<br>
Thanks and Regards<br>
Parang Saraf<br>
<a href="mailto:parang.saraf@gmail.com">parang.saraf@gmail.com</a><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>