<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-15"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
ok, I'll dig out some reference and usage information for this
projection<br>
<br>
yes, I noticed the 60km offset when my points showed up in the wrong
city ;-)<br>
<br>
-Michael<br>
<br>
Gabriel Ebner schrieb:
<blockquote cite="mid20060618103803.GI11892@achatina.gabrielebner.at"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 12:49:23PM +0200, Michael Haberler wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I got this projection example from a local GIS company, and it seems to work for data from different sources so far
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Then it might be ok for your dataset, however it doesn't look like anything
standard. Do you notice a 150m shift between the dataset and other data (cf.
datum transformation)?
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">the only difference I can discern from EPSG 31287 is +lat_0=48 instead of +lat_0=47.5
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
And the possible datum shift.
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I'm not a projection expert.. is your parameter set equivalent to this change in results?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
There's just a difference of 60km between the y-coordinates. :)
So the projection you've been given seems to be the right one for the dataset,
even though it's not any one I know of.
Gabriel.
</pre>
<pre wrap="">
<hr size="4" width="90%">
_______________________________________________
postgis-users mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net">postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users">http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>