<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
I had no trouble compiling GEOS SVN on MinGW. <br>
<br>
b<br>
<br>
Bruce Rindahl wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:001001c861c0$397e4210$0301a8c0@Bruce" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Ok let me try this differently :)
Has anyone had any luck compiling GOES 3.0 or GEOS SVN under MingW? It is
causing major crashes for me. If not then I will file a bug.
Thanks
Bruce
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Ramsey [<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:pramsey@refractions.net">mailto:pramsey@refractions.net</a>]
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2008 9:54 AM
To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:rindahl@lrcwe.com">rindahl@lrcwe.com</a>; PostGIS Users Discussion
Subject: Re: [postgis-users] PostGIS Contains / Intersects / Within
Performance
I don't know, try and tell us! :)
P
On Jan 25, 2008, at 7:58 PM, Bruce Rindahl wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Does the SVN of GEOS compile under MingW??
Bruce
-----Original Message-----
From: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:postgis-users-bounces@postgis.refractions.net">postgis-users-bounces@postgis.refractions.net</a>
[<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:postgis-users-bounces@postgis.refractions.net">mailto:postgis-users-bounces@postgis.refractions.net</a>] On Behalf Of
Paul
Ramsey
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 11:46 AM
To: PostGIS Users Discussion
Subject: [postgis-users] PostGIS Contains / Intersects / Within
Performance
I'd love to see some people here with large data volumes who do
contains/intersects/within tests do some testing of the new postgis/
geos prepared geometry code...
To test the new functions
- install the svn snapshot of GEOS
- install the svn snapshot of PostGIS
- use the ST_ContainsPrepared(g1,g2) predicate for the testing
We've seen performance improvements of between 5 and 100 times
faster. The bigger and more complicated your test geometries are,
the faster it should be.
Thanks,
P.
_______________________________________________
postgis-users mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net">postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users">http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users</a>
_______________________________________________
postgis-users mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net">postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users">http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
_______________________________________________
postgis-users mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net">postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users">http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>