<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=us-ascii" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 10.00.9200.16618"></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=479422901-08072013><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial>I'm only planning to be building PostgreSQL 9.3 with gcc
4.8 movign forward (2.1).</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=479422901-08072013><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=479422901-08072013><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial>The 2.1 for 9.2 and below I'll be building with the old
chain. This is mostly because if I switch 9.2 and below to use the
newer</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=479422901-08072013><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial>chain I have to do the same for 2.0 sicne its possible windows
users are using both 2.0 and 2.1 A newer gcc build will corrupt the old
2.0</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=479422901-08072013><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial>since they share the same dependencies.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=479422901-08072013><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=479422901-08072013><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial>Besides I want the 9.3 with newer gcc to be out in the field a
bit before I switch all to that. I may have winnnie build 4.8 as well for
the older for</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=479422901-08072013><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial>people who have run into the outstanding error handling issues
and who want to try the new build. Also the SEH handling (that the 4.8
64-bit uses) is </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=479422901-08072013><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial>supposed to be faster the old long/short jump error handling
for everything. I haven't had a chance to bench mark taht to see if that
is the case or not.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=479422901-08072013><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=479422901-08072013><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial>I've already switched Winnie to regress test the 9.3s (both
32,64) 2.1 against EDB distribute PostgreSQLs and will have the same shortly for
2.2 chain. So far so good :).</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=479422901-08072013><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=479422901-08072013><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=479422901-08072013></SPAN><FONT face=Arial><FONT
color=#0000ff><FONT size=2>Thanks,</FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=479422901-08072013></SPAN><SPAN
class=479422901-08072013></SPAN><FONT face=Arial><FONT color=#0000ff><FONT
size=2>R<SPAN
class=479422901-08072013>egina</SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV lang=en-us class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT size=2 face=Tahoma><B>From:</B> postgis-users-bounces@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:postgis-users-bounces@lists.osgeo.org] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Bborie
Park<BR><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, July 06, 2013 3:45 PM<BR><B>To:</B> PostGIS Users
Discussion<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [postgis-users] PostGIS 2.1.0 RC1 release
plan<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr>+1 for release.
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>I'm for whatever brings stability for the Windows world. Is 2.1 going to be
built with gcc 4.8?</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>-bborie</DIV></DIV>
<DIV class=gmail_extra><BR><BR>
<DIV class=gmail_quote>On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Paragon Corporation
<SPAN dir=ltr><<A href="mailto:lr@pcorp.us"
target=_blank>lr@pcorp.us</A>></SPAN> wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=gmail_quote
style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Anyone
have issue if I release PostGIS 2.1.0 RC1 later this week with plans<BR>to go
gold the week after?<BR><BR>We'll be holding off on doing any windows
stackbuilder distributions until<BR>GEOS 3.4.0 is released (and also longer
for 2.1.0 so we can package<BR>pgRouting 2.0 in there). We do plan to switch
2.0.4 to use GEOS 3.4.0 as<BR>well.<BR>These binaries will be available on
winnie postgis windows buildbot before<BR>they are finalized and pushed to
stackbuilder to give anxious folks
a<BR>headstart.<BR><BR>Thanks,<BR>Regina<BR><A href="http://postgis.net"
target=_blank>http://postgis.net</A><BR><A href="http://www.postgis.us"
target=_blank>http://www.postgis.us</A><BR><A href="http://www.bostongis.com"
target=_blank>http://www.bostongis.com</A><BR><A
href="http://www.paragoncorporation.com"
target=_blank>http://www.paragoncorporation.com</A><BR><BR><BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>postgis-users
mailing list<BR><A
href="mailto:postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org">postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org</A><BR><A
href="http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users"
target=_blank>http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users</A><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR></DIV></BODY></HTML>