<div dir="ltr">Are you using the PostgreSQL Yum repo?<div><br></div><div><a href="http://yum.postgresql.org/9.2/fedora/fedora-18-x86_64/repoview/">http://yum.postgresql.org/9.2/fedora/fedora-18-x86_64/repoview/</a><br></div>
<div><a href="http://yum.postgresql.org/9.2/fedora/fedora-18-i386/repoview/">http://yum.postgresql.org/9.2/fedora/fedora-18-i386/repoview/</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>The PostGIS project itself does not release any packages (except for Windows) so you'd have to ask the maintainer of the repo/package.</div>
<div><br></div><div>-bborie</div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Max Pyziur <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pyz@brama.com" target="_blank">pyz@brama.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Bborie Park wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
There shouldn't be any issues between PostgreSQL 9.2 and PostGIS 2.0. If there are, they'd be Fedora derived problems...<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Is there any chance that this will be corrected for Fedora 18? Technically, Fedora 18 won't go EOL until until one month after the release of Fedora 20; it would be nice to have these F18 packages available (PostGIS 2.0 and other related packages such as gdal, etc.)<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
-bborie<br>
</blockquote><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">
<br>
Max Pyziur<br>
<a href="mailto:pyz@brama.com" target="_blank">pyz@brama.com</a><br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Max Pyziur <<a href="mailto:pyz@brama.com" target="_blank">pyz@brama.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
Greetings,<br>
<br>
<br>
With the release of Fedora 18 there were interoperability issues with PostGIS and Postgresql. Fedora 18 was released with PostgreSQL 9.2.x and PostGIS 1.5.x. Given<br>
the mutual release schedule, only releases of PostGIS 2.0.x and higher can work with PostgreSQL 9.2.x.<br>
<br>
I see that Fedora 19 ships with PostGIS 2.0.3 and PostgreSQL 9.2.4. Do these packages work together correctly, or are there still issues?<br>
<br>
Much thanks,<br>
<br>
Max Pyziur<br>
<a href="mailto:pyz@brama.com" target="_blank">pyz@brama.com</a><br>
<br>
<br>
On Mon, 13 May 2013, Max Pyziur wrote:<br>
<br>
<br>
Or should we wait for Fedora 19?<br>
<br>
<br>
Max Pyziur<br>
<a href="mailto:pyz@brama.com" target="_blank">pyz@brama.com</a><br>
<br>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
postgis-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-<u></u>bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-<u></u>users</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
postgis-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-<u></u>bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-<u></u>users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>