<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Thanks, I'll check it out!</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">The covering speedup is something that really could benefit my workflows</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Paul<br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 10:00 PM Martin Davis <<a href="mailto:mtnclimb@gmail.com">mtnclimb@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div style="font-size:small">What are the benefits of this over the current implementation?<br></div><div style="font-size:small">If it's going to be speed, I volunteer!<br></div></div></blockquote><div> </div><div>This blog post has some details:  <a href="https://lin-ear-th-inking.blogspot.com/2020/05/jts-overlay-next-generation.html" target="_blank">https://lin-ear-th-inking.blogspot.com/2020/05/jts-overlay-next-generation.html</a> </div><div><br></div><div>Robustness is the primary focus, but there are some new optimizations which should make a performance difference in some cases.</div></div></div>
</blockquote></div>