<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Aptos;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;
mso-ligatures:none;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple style='word-wrap:break-word'><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>I personally want to release within the next 1-2 weeks cause we found some other issues we’d like to address as well.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>But we have to discuss first.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Thanks,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Regina<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div style='border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt'><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'> Łukasz Szałek via postgis-users <postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org> <br><b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, January 7, 2025 12:53 PM<br><b>To:</b> Paul Ramsey <pramsey@cleverelephant.ca><br><b>Cc:</b> PostGIS Users Discussion <postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: st_srid lost in st_union<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt'>How do you forecast the 3.5.2 release? What is the more/less date?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=PL style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'>Best regards<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.25in;text-indent:-.25in'><span lang=PL style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'>Łukasz Szałek<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=PL style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div id=mail-editor-reference-message-container><div><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><b><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'>From: </span></b><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'>Paul Ramsey <<a href="mailto:pramsey@cleverelephant.ca">pramsey@cleverelephant.ca</a>><br><b>Date: </b>Tuesday, 7 January 2025 at 18:22<br><b>To: </b>Łukasz Szałek <<a href="mailto:Lukasz.Szalek@tomtom.com">Lukasz.Szalek@tomtom.com</a>><br><b>Cc: </b>PostGIS Users Discussion <<a href="mailto:postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org">postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org</a>><br><b>Subject: </b>Re: st_srid lost in st_union<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt'>[Nie otrzymujesz często wiadomości e-mail z <a href="mailto:pramsey@cleverelephant.ca">pramsey@cleverelephant.ca</a>. Dowiedz się, dlaczego jest to ważne, na stronie <a href="https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification">https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification</a> ]<br><br>Sorry, no, it looks like due to an oversight the fix was applied to earlier branches, but not to 3.5, so 3.5.1 didn’t get it. It’s a one-liner in case you want to apply it yourself.<br><br><a href="https://github.com/postgis/postgis/commit/5b990cc7f4d91560aea78b5fd4b7656a398d2eb8">https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fpostgis%2Fpostgis%2Fcommit%2F5b990cc7f4d91560aea78b5fd4b7656a398d2eb8&data=05%7C02%7CLukasz.Szalek%40tomtom.com%7C48e1366b42a944b1191108dd2f3fd9e6%7C374f80267b544a3ab87d328fa26ec10d%7C0%7C0%7C638718673467028547%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=hhTAsTN3cldIDEu9mdHy%2F%2FPvljcDn5BjonAs7AVCyUQ%3D&reserved=0</a><br><br>Meanwhile, I pull apply it so it lands in 3.5.2.<br><br>P<br><br>> On Jan 7, 2025, at 9:12</span><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'> </span><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt'>AM, Łukasz Szałek via postgis-users <<a href="mailto:postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org">postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org</a>> wrote:<br>><br>> Hi all<br>> I have used postgres 17.2 with postgis 3.5.1<br>> POSTGIS="3.5.1 48ab069" [EXTENSION] PGSQL="170" GEOS="3.13.0-CAPI-1.19.0" PROJ="9.5.1 NETWORK_ENABLED=OFF URL_ENDPOINT=https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.proj.orguser_writable_directory%2F&data=05%7C02%7CLukasz.Szalek%40tomtom.com%7C48e1366b42a944b1191108dd2f3fd9e6%7C374f80267b544a3ab87d328fa26ec10d%7C0%7C0%7C638718673467047408%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=r5Ynjwi9YPrZpmas%2F70pTuhM%2BJxF%2BmC7bbSOvmIyYZ4%3D&reserved=0=/var/lib/pgsql/.local/share/proj DATABASE_PATH=/usr/proj95/share/proj/proj.db" (compiled against PROJ 9.5.1) LIBXML="2.9.13" LIBJSON="0.14" LIBPROTOBUF="1.3.3" WAGYU="0.5.0 (Internal)" TOPOLOGY<br>> As it should already fix the issue of loosing st_srid while doing st_union.<br>> However when doing :<br>> select ST_SRID(ST_GeomFromText('POLYGON ((4.9882543 50.4415584, 4.9882543 50.4415586, 4.9882545 50.4415586, 4.9882545 50.4415584, 4.9882543 50.4415584))',4326)),<br>> st_srid(ST_UNION(ARRAY[ST_GeomFromText('POLYGON ((4.9882543 50.4415584, 4.9882543 50.4415586, 4.9882545 50.4415586, 4.9882545 50.4415584, 4.9882543 50.4415584))',4326)])) ;<br>> again it is 4326 v 0.<br>> Can someone confirm that fix was released in 3.5.1 ?<br>> Best regards<br>> Łukasz Szałek<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div></div></div></div></body></html>