<html><head></head><body><div dir="auto">Well, it might also be a similar situation as with GEOS, and where I essenially need to wait for the next LTS release (to which I would like to stick and not custom compile myself), before I can benefit from the latest functionality with an updated SFCGAL. <br><br>But I was just wondering, as the situation appears slightly different in the sense that SFCGAL has its own PostgreSQL extension contrary to GEOS, so the setup and situation differs at least partially.</div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="auto">Greg Troxel <gdt@lexort.com> schreef op 3 september 2025 17:17:54 CEST:</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail"><div dir="auto">Marco Boeringa <marco@boeringa.demon.nl> writes:<br><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;"><div dir="auto"> Hi,<br><br> I noticed 3.6.0 became available on Ubuntu 24.04 where I am currently<br> running my PostgreSQL / PostGIS install.<br><br> Is this is a possible error during the packaging for the latest<br> release for Ubuntu?<br></div></blockquote><div dir="auto"><br>Yes, it seems quite possible :-)<br><br>I would suggest raising this within Ubuntu, as it seems far more likely<br>to be an Ubuntu packaging issue than a postgis (source release) issue.<br><br>You might also see which version of SFCGAL is installed on your system,<br>and what the dependency specification is for the postgis package.<br></div></pre></blockquote></div></body></html>