
<html>


<head>


<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">


</head>


<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">


Mike,


<div class=""><br class="">


</div>


<div class="">RTD would definitely be a good option to provide multiple versions of the docs.</div>


<div class="">If you are willing to spend some time to get that working that would be great.</div>


<div class="">It’s only recently that we’ve actually had docs that was worth keeping multiple</div>


<div class="">versions of, so now is a good time to revisit the question of RTD.</div>


<div class=""><br class="">


</div>


<div class="">We can still use <a href="http://proj.org" class="">proj.org</a> with RTD, right?</div>


<div class="">


<div><br class="">


</div>


<div>/Kristian</div>


<div><br class="">


<blockquote type="cite" class="">


<div class="">On 6 Jan 2020, at 23:50, Mike Taves <<a href="mailto:mwtoews@gmail.com" class="">mwtoews@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div>


<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">


<div class="">


<div class="">I've previously suggested adapting Read the Docs [1] to publish the<br class="">


PROJ documentation for multiple versions and formats.<br class="">


<br class="">


It could be worthwhile investigating how to integrate RTD to provide this need.<br class="">


<br class="">


[1] <a href="https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ/issues/1122" class="">https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ/issues/1122</a><br class="">


_______________________________________________<br class="">


PROJ mailing list<br class="">


<a href="mailto:PROJ@lists.osgeo.org" class="">PROJ@lists.osgeo.org</a><br class="">


https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj<br class="">


</div>


</div>


</blockquote>


</div>


<br class="">


</div>


</body>


</html>