<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
Mike,
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">RTD would definitely be a good option to provide multiple versions of the docs.</div>
<div class="">If you are willing to spend some time to get that working that would be great.</div>
<div class="">It’s only recently that we’ve actually had docs that was worth keeping multiple</div>
<div class="">versions of, so now is a good time to revisit the question of RTD.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">We can still use <a href="http://proj.org" class="">proj.org</a> with RTD, right?</div>
<div class="">
<div><br class="">
</div>
<div>/Kristian</div>
<div><br class="">
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="">On 6 Jan 2020, at 23:50, Mike Taves <<a href="mailto:mwtoews@gmail.com" class="">mwtoews@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<div class="">
<div class="">I've previously suggested adapting Read the Docs [1] to publish the<br class="">
PROJ documentation for multiple versions and formats.<br class="">
<br class="">
It could be worthwhile investigating how to integrate RTD to provide this need.<br class="">
<br class="">
[1] <a href="https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ/issues/1122" class="">https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ/issues/1122</a><br class="">
_______________________________________________<br class="">
PROJ mailing list<br class="">
<a href="mailto:PROJ@lists.osgeo.org" class="">PROJ@lists.osgeo.org</a><br class="">
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj<br class="">
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br class="">
</div>
</body>
</html>