<div dir="auto">+1</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">fre. 31. jan. 2020 09.00 skrev Kristian Evers <<a href="mailto:kreve@sdfe.dk">kreve@sdfe.dk</a>>:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I think a bump to 3.9 is a good idea. Per RFC3 we need the PSC to approve this,<br>
so let's have a motion on the subject. <br>
<br>
I'll start with my +1<br>
<br>
/Kristian<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: PROJ <<a href="mailto:proj-bounces@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">proj-bounces@lists.osgeo.org</a>> On Behalf Of Mike Taves<br>
Sent: 30. januar 2020 22:15<br>
To: <a href="mailto:proj@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">proj@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
Subject: Re: [PROJ] Bump CMake version for PROJ 7.0<br>
<br>
Any further discussion? Is a bump to CMake 3.9 OK for everyone?<br>
<br>
Note there was recently a bit of discussion on a GitHub ticket:<br>
<a href="https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ/issues/1858#issuecomment-576718862" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ/issues/1858#issuecomment-576718862</a><br>
<br>
On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 09:49, Mike Taves <<a href="mailto:mwtoews@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">mwtoews@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Hi all,<br>
><br>
> As was suggested in <a href="https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ/pull/1542" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ/pull/1542</a> this is a<br>
> discussion to bump the minimum CMake version for PROJ 7.0<br>
><br>
> Based on the default versions of CMake [1], I can see that CMake 3.9<br>
> is installed on most development systems, including Travis CI, so this<br>
> would be an ideal minimum.<br>
><br>
> CMake 3.9.0 was released [2] July 2017, so is at least 2 years old for<br>
> PROJ RFC 3's requirement.<br>
><br>
> One feature from this version that I plan to implement is<br>
> CheckIPOSupported [3] module. GoogleTest [4] was added for this<br>
> release, however I don't think it would provide any advantage.<br>
><br>
> Any other thoughts or suggestions on other CMake versions?<br>
><br>
> Cheers,<br>
> Mike<br>
><br>
> [1] <a href="https://cliutils.gitlab.io/modern-cmake/chapters/intro/installing.html#cmake-default-versions" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://cliutils.gitlab.io/modern-cmake/chapters/intro/installing.html#cmake-default-versions</a><br>
> [2] <a href="https://blog.kitware.com/cmake-3-9-0-available-for-download/" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://blog.kitware.com/cmake-3-9-0-available-for-download/</a><br>
> [3] <a href="https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.9/module/CheckIPOSupported.html" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.9/module/CheckIPOSupported.html</a><br>
> [4] <a href="https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.9/module/GoogleTest.html" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.9/module/GoogleTest.html</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
PROJ mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:PROJ@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">PROJ@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
PROJ mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:PROJ@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">PROJ@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj</a><br>
</blockquote></div>