Hmmm, might be a difference in the versions of the EPSG file. It hasn't been updated in a little while.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 8:16 AM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jeffery.fitzgerald@gmail.com">jeffery.fitzgerald@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hey,<br><br>I noticed that the epsg file that ships with proj4j has a different entry for ESPG:28992 than I have seen in proj.<br>
<br>proj4j epsg<br># Amersfoort / RD New<br><28992> +proj=sterea +lat_0=52.15616055555555 +lon_0=5.38763888888889 +k=0.9999079 +x_0=155000 +y_0=463000 +ellps=bessel +towgs84=565.417,50.3319,465.552,-0.398957,0.343988,-1.8774,4.0725 +units=m +no_defs <><br>
<br>gdal epsg<br># Amersfoort / RD New<br><28992> +proj=sterea +lat_0=52.15616055555555 +lon_0=5.38763888888889 +k=0.9999079 +x_0=155000 +y_0=463000 +ellps=bessel +units=m +no_defs <><br><br>Does anyone know why? It was causing me some trouble until I removed the towgs84.<br>
<br>Thanks.<br><br>Fitz<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Proj4j mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Proj4j@lists.osgeo.org">Proj4j@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj4j" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj4j</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>