<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=iso-8859-1"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">Hi Cameron, et. al.<div><div apple-content-edited="true"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; "><br></span>
</div>
<br><div><div>On Oct 14, 2014, at 5:57 PM, Cameron Shorter <<a href="mailto:cameron.shorter@gmail.com">cameron.shorter@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">Jeff, Jody,<br>I agree that there is value in OSGeo projects being listed in the OGC portal, and that we should work out what OGC and OSGeo consider as a requirement for listing a project.<br><br>Looking at: <a href="http://www.opengeospatial.org/resource/products/registration">http://www.opengeospatial.org/resource/products/registration</a><br>It seems that any application can be registered, free of charge? </blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes.</div><br><blockquote type="cite">To get to the next level of "certified" or "reference implementation" might cost more.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>There is no cost if you set up a server (endpoint) for others to exercise for free.</div><br><blockquote type="cite">Luis, are you able to explain this further, or point at a URL which explains costs?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>If you want to pay the fees</div><div><a href="http://www.opengeospatial.org/compliance#trademark">http://www.opengeospatial.org/compliance#trademark</a></div><div>in the case of OSGeo it will be $80 per year per product per standard</div><br><blockquote type="cite"><br>I agree with Jeff that we at OSGeo should work out a process for registering compliant products with the OGC. I suggest that this should become part of the OSGeo Incubation process, which in turn should be referenced from the OSGeo-Live processes.<br></blockquote><div><br></div>And you need to update the database, for example every time a new project implements a new standard.</div><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><br>Jeff,<br>I notice that MapCache (which I understand is associated with MapServer) has been registered separately with OGC, but MapCache is not referenced as one of our OSGeo projects at: <a href="http://osgeo.org">http://osgeo.org</a> . I suggest that we should do something about that.<br><br>We should be working out what criteria projects require before they can be listed under an OSGeo banner on OGC compliant products page. Only graduated projects? Graduated and Incubating projects? Any project listed on OSGeo-Live? Any project which has self registered to be part of OSGeo Labs? Any Open Source project with some geospatial functionality?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>The issue is that we need an organization to be "legally" responsible for the project that is claiming compliance. This organization is the one that we will give the trademark license to use to OGC Certified logo. The question to ask is: Is OSGeo only legally responsible for graduated projects?</div><br><blockquote type="cite">I'd like to hear OGC's thoughts on this. Does the OGC have any quality requirements for listing applications?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Anyone can list an application in the OGC implementation database. We clean it periodically, for example to spot fake organizations or products. This rarely happens.</div><div><br></div><div>Please let me know how else can I help.</div><div><br></div><div><span style="orphans: 2; widows: 2;">- Luis</span><br style="orphans: 2; widows: 2;"><br style="orphans: 2; widows: 2;"><span style="orphans: 2; widows: 2;">---------------------------------------------------</span><br style="orphans: 2; widows: 2;"><span style="orphans: 2; widows: 2;">Luis Bermudez, Ph.D.</span><br style="orphans: 2; widows: 2;"><span style="orphans: 2; widows: 2;">Director Compliance Program</span><br style="orphans: 2; widows: 2;"><span style="orphans: 2; widows: 2;">Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC)</span><br style="orphans: 2; widows: 2;"><span style="orphans: 2; widows: 2;">The OGC: Making Location Count</span><br style="orphans: 2; widows: 2;"><br style="orphans: 2; widows: 2;"><span style="orphans: 2; widows: 2;">Skype: bermudez_luis</span><br style="orphans: 2; widows: 2;"><span style="orphans: 2; widows: 2;">Twitter: @berdez</span><br style="orphans: 2; widows: 2;"><span style="orphans: 2; widows: 2;">Tel: +1 301 760 7323</span><br style="orphans: 2; widows: 2;"><span style="orphans: 2; widows: 2;"><a href="http://www.opengeospatial.org/ogc/organization/staff/lbermudez">http://www.opengeospatial.org/ogc/organization/staff/lbermudez</a></span><br style="orphans: 2; widows: 2;"><br style="orphans: 2; widows: 2;"></div><br><blockquote type="cite"><br>On 15/10/2014 7:58 am, Jeff McKenna wrote:<br><blockquote type="cite">On 2014-10-14 4:48 PM, Jeff McKenna wrote:<br><blockquote type="cite">Hi Jody,<br><br>Thanks for picking up the ball on this. Actually I had added this topic<br>to this Thursday's Board meeting agenda, a few weeks ago, but this new<br>Projects list is indeed the best place to discuss this. Thanks.<br><br>At FOSS4G Portland we discussed many issues with the OGC's Luis<br>Bermudez. Here is an attempt of a summary, so hopefully we can all work<br>together to get things set up here now:<br><br>- a new 'Open Source Geospatial Foundation' organization/account was<br>created (visible at <a href="http://www.opengeospatial.org/resource/products/">http://www.opengeospatial.org/resource/products/</a>)<br><br>- therefore we now have a generic 'osgeo' account with password. The<br>contact name is listed as myself and the contact email is<br>info(at)<a href="http://osgeo.org">osgeo.org</a>. My plan is/was to motion to the Board this Thursday<br>to pass the account details to the OSGeo Secretary, so he/she can help<br>manage/distribute these connection details to OSGeo Project officers<br>whenever necessary. (we can login at<br><a href="http://www.opengeospatial.org/resource/products/registration">http://www.opengeospatial.org/resource/products/registration</a>)<br><br>- goal is to have all OSGeo 'products' (our projects) listed under the<br>one OSGeo organization.<br><br>- the OGC was very clear that only OSGeo officers (legal representatives<br>of the foundation, and therefore legal authority over the<br>'product'/project) can submit implementations etc.<br><br>- we therefore made a push with the OSGeo Secretary recently to make<br>sure our OSGeo Officers records are accurate (i.e. who exactly is an<br>officer of OSGeo:<br><a href="http://www.osgeo.org/content/foundation/board_and_officers.html">http://www.osgeo.org/content/foundation/board_and_officers.html</a>)<br><br>- MapServer and GDAL 'products'/projects were transferred from Daniel<br>Morissette's account into OSGeo's organization account, with the help of<br>Luis and Daniel at FOSS4G Portland.<br><br>- to answer your questions, this is the process we must all figure out<br>what is best and makes the most sense, but personally I believe to get<br>other projects like GeoServer added to the list, the project's officer<br>should contact the OSGeo Secretary (info@) initially, and then the<br>secretary will provide account access for submissions etc.<br></blockquote><br>Of course I forgot to mention that in the case of GeoServer, the records are currently being maintained by Boundless, and a transfer of sorts would have to occur.<br><br>Anyway I'm interested to hear yours and all project officer's opinions. I can then bring this to the OSGeo Board on Thursday.<br><br><br><blockquote type="cite"><br>Some unresolved issues:<br><br>- there are costs involved in submissions, who covers these costs?<br><br>- how do we handle projects/products that are in Incubation? (such as<br>Rasdaman) Are Incubation projects, and their lead contact, considered<br>as legal authority /officer of the OSGeo foundation?<br><br>Thoughts?<br><br>Let's all work through this together :)<br><br>-jeff<br><br><br><br><br><br><br>On 2014-10-14 3:21 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:<br><blockquote type="cite">OSGeo is now listed as an organisation by the OGC (see<br><a href="http://www.opengeospatial.org/resource/products">http://www.opengeospatial.org/resource/products</a>).<br><br>Questions:<br>- Anyone know how we get GeoServer added to that list?<br>- Are we in position to run CITE tests and get implementations certified?<br><br>-- <br>Jody Garnett<br><br><br></blockquote></blockquote>_______________________________________________<br>Projects mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Projects@lists.osgeo.org">Projects@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/projects<br></blockquote><br>-- <br>Cameron Shorter,<br>Software and Data Solutions Manager<br>LISAsoft<br>Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,<br>26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009<br><br>P +61 2 9009 5000, W <a href="http://www.lisasoft.com">www.lisasoft.com</a>, F +61 2 9009 5099<br><br></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>