[pygeoapi] RFC1: Project Steering Committee Guidelines

[Tom Kralidis]

Hi Ian: thanks for the info.  Looks like this is rooted in [4].  I'm
fine with your proposed change or removing the first paragraph
from [1] [2] [3] (please feel free to submit pull requests).

Thanks

..Tom

[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Request_for_Comments

On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 7:17 AM Ian Edwards <ian.edwards at myacorn.com> wrote:
>
> The pycsw [1], pywps [2] and pygeoapi [3] RFC pages all contain the phrase:
>
>   The IETF adopts some of the proposals published as RFCs as Internet standards.
>
> Is this intentional or should they be changed to something along the lines of:
>
>   The pygeoapi project adopts some of the proposals published as RFCs when determining the future direction of the project.
>
> Does anyone know the original source of the text (I can't find it at MapServer or at IETF)?
>
> [1] https://pycsw.org/development/rfc/
> [2] https://pywps.org/development/rfcs/
> [3] https://pygeoapi.io/development/rfc/
>
>
> On Sun Oct 13 17:19:29 PDT 2019,  Tom Kralidis wrote:
> >
> > Hi all: as part of the process of setting up a project steering committee
> > as well as an RFC framework I have drafted PSC guidelines in [1].  Note
> > that much of the RFC borrows from the pycsw RFC/PSC framework (which
> > itself borrowed from the MapServer equivalents).
> >
> > Given this the first RFC I will leave open for comments (feel free to comment
> > here or on Gitter) until 20 October 2019, at which point the RFC will be put
> > forth for vote to mint the PSC and bless the project RFC process.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > ..Tom
> >
> > [1] https://pygeoapi.io/development/rfc/1
> _______________________________________________
> pygeoapi mailing list
> pygeoapi at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pygeoapi