[pygeoapi] PSC vote: RFC3: Architectural Decision Records

[Angelos Tzotsos]

I am voting -0 on this. I feel that RFC mechanism already covers this. A 
change in architecture would need to go through an RFC to be approved.

Angelos

On 2/18/24 16:13, Tom Kralidis via pygeoapi wrote:
> +1
>
> ..Tom
>
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 9:12 AM Jorge S. Mendes de Jesus via pygeoapi <
> pygeoapi at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
>
>> Hereby my vote: +1
>>
>> See you in Evora.....lets see what the bones have to say....
>>
>> On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 at 14:59, Francesco Bartoli via pygeoapi <
>> pygeoapi at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all: I've drafted a new RFC
>>> https://github.com/geopython/pygeoapi.io/blob/master/docs/development/rfc/3.md and
>>> I'm looking for your consensus to adopt this methodology as best practice
>>> in the development process.
>>>
>>> Please let me know your thoughts, I'm available anytime before the code
>>> sprint to discuss and review any comment or amendment.
>>>
>>> I'm starting the voting process with my +1.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Francesco
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> pygeoapi mailing list
>>> pygeoapi at lists.osgeo.org
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pygeoapi
>>>
>>
>> --
>> OpenPGP Key: 0x7212572C
>> _______________________________________________
>> pygeoapi mailing list
>> pygeoapi at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pygeoapi
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pygeoapi mailing list
> pygeoapi at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pygeoapi


-- 
Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
President
Open Source Geospatial Foundation
http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos