[pygeoapi] for review: RFC4 - GitHub Issue and Pull Request management

[Ricardo Filipe Soares Garcia da]

Seems good to me, apart from a minor formatting issue with the last two
items on the 'Implementation' section, which I guess would be indented as
sub-items.

Tom Kralidis via pygeoapi <pygeoapi at lists.osgeo.org> escreveu (domingo,
3/03/2024 à(s) 22:03):

> Hi all: as discussed last week, please find RFC4 [1] for review and
> discussion. If/once we update as needed, I will put to a PSC vote for
> formal approval later this week.
>
>
> Thanks
>
> ..Tom
>
>
>
> [1] https://pygeoapi.io/development/rfc/4
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pygeoapi mailing list
> pygeoapi at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pygeoapi
>


-- 
___________________________ ___ __
Ricardo Garcia Silva
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pygeoapi/attachments/20240304/00add2aa/attachment.htm>