<div dir="ltr"><div>I think for now it is good enough <br>+1<br><br></div>But it will more efford than expected to have everything at 100%<br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 at 13:36, Youssef Harby via pygeoapi <<a href="mailto:pygeoapi@lists.osgeo.org">pygeoapi@lists.osgeo.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div><div id="m_4184801814453253092editor_version_7.29.0_7sMnISV6" style="word-break:break-word"><div style="margin-top:4px;margin-bottom:4px;line-height:1.6"><div dir="auto" style="font-size:14px">+1</div></div><div style="margin-top:4px;margin-bottom:4px;line-height:1.6"><div dir="auto" style="font-size:14px">Could we also consider allowing maxitems, defaultitems, maxdistance, etc., to support an indicator (like unlimited or -1) for cases where users need the full resource or no limits/pagination applied? This would provide more flexibility without being tied to a fixed number, especially for servers with small layers/resources servers...</div></div><div style="margin-top:4px;margin-bottom:4px;line-height:1.6"><div dir="auto" style="font-size:14px"><br></div></div></div><div id="m_4184801814453253092lark-mail-quote-173616697"><div><div style="border-left:medium;padding-left:0px"><div><div id="m_4184801814453253092lark-mail-meta-5ULpkI8i4" style="padding:12px;background:rgb(245,246,247);color:rgb(31,35,41);border-radius:4px;margin-top:24px;margin-bottom:12px"><div id="m_4184801814453253092lark-mail-quote-366fd6afccda0fb44bd5678093efe945"><div style="word-break:break-word"><div><span style="white-space:nowrap">From: </span> <span style="white-space:nowrap">"Angelos Tzotsos via pygeoapi"<<a style="white-space:pre-wrap;word-break:break-word;text-decoration:none;color:inherit" href="mailto:pygeoapi@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">pygeoapi@lists.osgeo.org</a>></span></div><div><span style="white-space:nowrap">Date: </span> Mon, Jan 6, 2025, 2:22 PM</div><div><span style="white-space:nowrap">Subject: </span> Re: [pygeoapi] PSC vote: RFC5: Enhanced data limit handling</div><div><span style="white-space:nowrap">To: </span> <span style="white-space:nowrap"><<a style="white-space:pre-wrap;word-break:break-word;text-decoration:none;color:inherit" href="mailto:pygeoapi@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">pygeoapi@lists.osgeo.org</a>></span></div></div></div></div><div><div>+1
<br>Angelos
<br>
<br>On 1/6/25 03:44, Tom Kralidis via pygeoapi wrote:
<br>> Hi all: FYI per subject, putting RFC5 [1] to PSC vote.
<br>>
<br>> I will start with my +1.
<br>>
<br>> Thanks
<br>>
<br>> ..Tom
<br>>
<br><span>> [1] <a href="https://pygeoapi.io/development/rfc/5" target="_blank">https://pygeoapi.io/development/rfc/5</a>
</span><br>>
<br>>
<br>> _______________________________________________
<br>> pygeoapi mailing list
<br><span>> <a href="mailto:pygeoapi@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">pygeoapi@lists.osgeo.org</a>
</span><br><span>> <a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pygeoapi" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pygeoapi</a>
</span><br>
<br>
<br>-- 
<br>Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
<br>President, Board of Directors
<br>Open Source Geospatial Foundation
<br><span><a href="https://www.osgeo.org/member/angelos-tzotsos/" target="_blank">https://www.osgeo.org/member/angelos-tzotsos/</a>
</span><br>
<br>_______________________________________________
<br>pygeoapi mailing list
<br><span><a href="mailto:pygeoapi@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">pygeoapi@lists.osgeo.org</a>
</span><br><span><a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pygeoapi" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pygeoapi</a></span><br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>_______________________________________________<br>
pygeoapi mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:pygeoapi@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">pygeoapi@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pygeoapi" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pygeoapi</a><br>
</blockquote></div><div><br clear="all"></div><br><span class="gmail_signature_prefix">-- </span><br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature">OpenPGP Key: 0x7212572C</div>