[Pywps-dev] Complex and Literal Validators

[Luís de Sousa]

Thanks for replying Jorge. Quite frankly I do not remember what was
decided on this last year, but what you wrote makes all the sense.

Cheers,

Luís

On 14 April 2015 at 17:18, Jorge Samuel Mendes de Jesus
<jorge.mendesdejesus at wur.nl> wrote:
> Hi to all
>
> This sort of validation was decided in a meeting in Lux, the data
> validation is more or less a schema content validation and/or image
> mimetype, I think the default option was NONE (Jachym?, Luis?)
>
> According to the level of validation, PyWPS has to raise an
> invalidParameterValue
>
> For example
> in SIMPLE:
> XML OK  --> No error
>
> STRICT:
> XML OK + OK Schema validation -->No error
>
> STRICT:
> XML OK + BAD Schema validation -->InvalidParameterValue
>
> VERYSTRICT:
> XML OK + OK Schema validation+ UTF etc etc --> No error
>
> Jorge
>
> On 14-04-15 14:40, Calin Ciociu wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>>
>> Validators are currently not being used and there are 4 different modes:
>>
>> * NONE
>> * SIMPLE
>> * STRICT
>> * VERYSTRICT
>>
>> So I was wondering how exactly does the data have to be validated?
>>
>> Which mode should be used when?
>>
>> As far as I understood the data is supposed to be validated after
>> fetching the data.
>>
>> Should PyWPS raise an InvalidParameterValue if the data cant be
>> validated?
>>
>>
>> Calin
>> _______________________________________________
>> pywps-dev mailing list
>> pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev
>
> --
> ISRIC - World Soil Information
> Post: PO box 353, 6700 AJ, Wageningen,
> The Netherlands Visiting Address: Droevendaalsesteeg 3, 6708 PB
> Wageningen (Bdg. 101),
> Office: C.013
> Office Phone: +31 (0) 317 4 83715
> Mobile Phone: +31 (0) 613 9 06950
> OpenPGPKey: 0xA3D0065A
>
> _______________________________________________
> pywps-dev mailing list
> pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev