[Pywps-dev] [Incubator] [motion] PyWPS to enter incubation (fwd)

[Tom Kralidis]

Thanks Jachym.  I've updated InCom and passed the motion for Board approval.
I've also filed a ticket to add PyWPS to the Incubating Projects list [1].

I think the next logical step here is to start tackling the project graduation
checklist [2], and suggest we use the PyWPS GitHub Wiki as the area to manage
the chceklist [3].

Using pycsw as a recent example, [4] provides a proposal on how we tracked and
managed the entire incubation process.  What do folks think?

Cheers

..Tom

[1] http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/1488
[2] http://www.osgeo.org/incubator/process/project_graduation_checklist.html
[3] https://github.com/geopython/PyWPS/wiki
[4] https://github.com/geopython/pycsw/wiki/OSGeo-Incubation

On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Jachym Cepicky wrote:

> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 10:47:30 +0000
> From: Jachym Cepicky <jachym.cepicky at gmail.com>
> To: Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com>,
>     Luís de Sousa <luis.a.de.sousa at gmail.com>
> Cc: "pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org" <pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
> Subject: Re: [Pywps-dev] [Incubator] [motion] PyWPS to enter incubation (fwd)
> 
> As Luis is writing and Tom concluding: PyWPS currently  == PyWPS 3
>
> The repositories are keeped seperated, to point out, "this is something
> completely new, new philosophy, code base, license". Once is baked (at
> least support for WPS 1:0.0), I would like to move it to geopython project
>
> J
>
> pá 17. 4. 2015 v 14:16 odesílatel Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com>
> napsal:
>
>> Sounds like PyWPS = PyWPS 3, then.
>>
>> I think Jachym as the main contact can update incom.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Apr 16, 2015, at 09:26, Luís de Sousa <luis.a.de.sousa at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> The goal is for PyWPS 4 to support WPS 2.0, support for 1.0 is nearly
>> covered, appart from assynchronous execution.
>>
>> As PyWPS 4 is still in development and not user ready, I would prefer to
>> keep it in its own repo for now. Once we deem it ready for public release
>> then we can think of merging the repos.
>>
>> How can the InCom be contacted? Or is it something Jachym can do?
>>
>> Luis
>> On 16 Apr 2015 15:13, "Tom Kralidis" <tomkralidis at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks Luis.  Can someone clarify this to InCom, then?
>>>
>>> I'm wondering whether PyWPS 3 / 4 should be in the same repository, with
>>> 3 being master and 4 being a branch? This way the project is logically
>>> consistent ('PyWPS').
>>>
>>> Will PyWPS 4 support WPS 1.0.0?
>>>
>>> On Thu, 9 Apr 2015, Luís de Sousa wrote:
>>>
>>>  Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 22:02:33 +0200
>>>> From: Luís de Sousa <luis.a.de.sousa at gmail.com>
>>>> To: Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com>
>>>> Cc: "pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org" <pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [Pywps-dev] [Incubator] [motion] PyWPS to enter incubation
>>>> (fwd)
>>>>
>>>> Hi Tom,
>>>>
>>>> These two versions are part of a same project.  Version 4 is a major
>>>> step forward from version 3, but the underlying concept is the same.
>>>>
>>>> More than a re-write, PyWPS-4 is intended to deliver WPS 2.0 compliance.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Luís
>>>>
>>>> On 9 April 2015 at 13:54, Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all: FYI per below for clarification as we move forward with OSGeo
>>>>> incubation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can someone response to Dimitris' question?
>>>>>
>>>>> ..Tom
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 03:58:09 +0200 (CEST)
>>>>> From: Dimitris Kotzinos <kotzino at gmail.com>
>>>>> To: incubator at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Incubator] [motion] PyWPS to enter incubation
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> no objection in general and the project is within OSGEO scope and has
>>>>> been
>>>>> around for quite a long time. But I would like to ask for a
>>>>> clarification
>>>>> before voting: what is the relation between PyWPS-3 and PyWPS-4 and
>>>>> since
>>>>> the second is written from scratch do we accept both for incubation?
>>>>> And if
>>>>> so as one project?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks in advance for clarifying this,
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Dimitris
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Incubator mailing list
>>>>> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> pywps-dev mailing list
>>>>> pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>> pywps-dev mailing list
>> pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev
>