<div dir="ltr">I've started this<br><br><a href="https://github.com/geopython/PyWPS/wiki/OSGeo_Incubation_checklist">https://github.com/geopython/PyWPS/wiki/OSGeo_Incubation_checklist</a><br><div><br></div><div>how will we approach? who will mark the items as "checked" after which procedure?</div><div><br></div><div>J</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote">čt 23. 4. 2015 v 19:09 odesílatel Jachym Cepicky <<a href="mailto:jachym.cepicky@gmail.com">jachym.cepicky@gmail.com</a>> napsal:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">I just say: thank you for keeping this warm.<br><br>I'm all for your proposals. Will start the wiki a bit.</div><div dir="ltr"><div><div><br></div><div>J</div></div></div><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><div>P.S. Sorry for long response times from myself - this spring is somehow fast</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote">čt 23. 4. 2015 v 15:39 odesílatel Tom Kralidis <<a href="mailto:tomkralidis@gmail.com" target="_blank">tomkralidis@gmail.com</a>> napsal:</div><div class="gmail_quote"><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
Thanks Jachym. I've updated InCom and passed the motion for Board approval.<br>
I've also filed a ticket to add PyWPS to the Incubating Projects list [1].<br>
<br>
I think the next logical step here is to start tackling the project graduation<br>
checklist [2], and suggest we use the PyWPS GitHub Wiki as the area to manage<br>
the chceklist [3].<br>
<br>
Using pycsw as a recent example, [4] provides a proposal on how we tracked and<br>
managed the entire incubation process. What do folks think?<br>
<br>
Cheers<br>
<br>
..Tom<br>
<br>
[1] <a href="http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/1488" target="_blank">http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/1488</a><br>
[2] <a href="http://www.osgeo.org/incubator/process/project_graduation_checklist.html" target="_blank">http://www.osgeo.org/incubator/process/project_graduation_checklist.html</a><br>
[3] <a href="https://github.com/geopython/PyWPS/wiki" target="_blank">https://github.com/geopython/PyWPS/wiki</a><br>
[4] <a href="https://github.com/geopython/pycsw/wiki/OSGeo-Incubation" target="_blank">https://github.com/geopython/pycsw/wiki/OSGeo-Incubation</a><br>
<br>
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Jachym Cepicky wrote:<br>
<br>
> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 10:47:30 +0000<br>
> From: Jachym Cepicky <<a href="mailto:jachym.cepicky@gmail.com" target="_blank">jachym.cepicky@gmail.com</a>><br>
> To: Tom Kralidis <<a href="mailto:tomkralidis@gmail.com" target="_blank">tomkralidis@gmail.com</a>>,<br>
> Luís de Sousa <<a href="mailto:luis.a.de.sousa@gmail.com" target="_blank">luis.a.de.sousa@gmail.com</a>><br>
> Cc: "<a href="mailto:pywps-dev@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">pywps-dev@lists.osgeo.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:pywps-dev@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">pywps-dev@lists.osgeo.org</a>><br>
> Subject: Re: [Pywps-dev] [Incubator] [motion] PyWPS to enter incubation (fwd)<br>
><br>
> As Luis is writing and Tom concluding: PyWPS currently == PyWPS 3<br>
><br>
> The repositories are keeped seperated, to point out, "this is something<br>
> completely new, new philosophy, code base, license". Once is baked (at<br>
> least support for WPS 1:0.0), I would like to move it to geopython project<br>
><br>
> J<br>
><br>
> pá 17. 4. 2015 v 14:16 odesílatel Tom Kralidis <<a href="mailto:tomkralidis@gmail.com" target="_blank">tomkralidis@gmail.com</a>><br>
> napsal:<br>
><br>
>> Sounds like PyWPS = PyWPS 3, then.<br>
>><br>
>> I think Jachym as the main contact can update incom.<br>
>><br>
>> Sent from my iPhone<br>
>><br>
>> On Apr 16, 2015, at 09:26, Luís de Sousa <<a href="mailto:luis.a.de.sousa@gmail.com" target="_blank">luis.a.de.sousa@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Hi Tom,<br>
>><br>
>> The goal is for PyWPS 4 to support WPS 2.0, support for 1.0 is nearly<br>
>> covered, appart from assynchronous execution.<br>
>><br>
>> As PyWPS 4 is still in development and not user ready, I would prefer to<br>
>> keep it in its own repo for now. Once we deem it ready for public release<br>
>> then we can think of merging the repos.<br>
>><br>
>> How can the InCom be contacted? Or is it something Jachym can do?<br>
>><br>
>> Luis<br>
>> On 16 Apr 2015 15:13, "Tom Kralidis" <<a href="mailto:tomkralidis@gmail.com" target="_blank">tomkralidis@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>>><br>
>>> Thanks Luis. Can someone clarify this to InCom, then?<br>
>>><br>
>>> I'm wondering whether PyWPS 3 / 4 should be in the same repository, with<br>
>>> 3 being master and 4 being a branch? This way the project is logically<br>
>>> consistent ('PyWPS').<br>
>>><br>
>>> Will PyWPS 4 support WPS 1.0.0?<br>
>>><br>
>>> On Thu, 9 Apr 2015, Luís de Sousa wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>> Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 22:02:33 +0200<br>
>>>> From: Luís de Sousa <<a href="mailto:luis.a.de.sousa@gmail.com" target="_blank">luis.a.de.sousa@gmail.com</a>><br>
>>>> To: Tom Kralidis <<a href="mailto:tomkralidis@gmail.com" target="_blank">tomkralidis@gmail.com</a>><br>
>>>> Cc: "<a href="mailto:pywps-dev@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">pywps-dev@lists.osgeo.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:pywps-dev@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">pywps-dev@lists.osgeo.org</a>><br>
>>>> Subject: Re: [Pywps-dev] [Incubator] [motion] PyWPS to enter incubation<br>
>>>> (fwd)<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Hi Tom,<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> These two versions are part of a same project. Version 4 is a major<br>
>>>> step forward from version 3, but the underlying concept is the same.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> More than a re-write, PyWPS-4 is intended to deliver WPS 2.0 compliance.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Cheers,<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Luís<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> On 9 April 2015 at 13:54, Tom Kralidis <<a href="mailto:tomkralidis@gmail.com" target="_blank">tomkralidis@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> Hi all: FYI per below for clarification as we move forward with OSGeo<br>
>>>>> incubation.<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> Can someone response to Dimitris' question?<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> ..Tom<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>
>>>>> Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 03:58:09 +0200 (CEST)<br>
>>>>> From: Dimitris Kotzinos <<a href="mailto:kotzino@gmail.com" target="_blank">kotzino@gmail.com</a>><br>
>>>>> To: <a href="mailto:incubator@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">incubator@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Incubator] [motion] PyWPS to enter incubation<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> Hi all,<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> no objection in general and the project is within OSGEO scope and has<br>
>>>>> been<br>
>>>>> around for quite a long time. But I would like to ask for a<br>
>>>>> clarification<br>
>>>>> before voting: what is the relation between PyWPS-3 and PyWPS-4 and<br>
>>>>> since<br>
>>>>> the second is written from scratch do we accept both for incubation?<br>
>>>>> And if<br>
>>>>> so as one project?<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> Thanks in advance for clarifying this,<br>
>>>>> Best regards,<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> Dimitris<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>>>>> Incubator mailing list<br>
>>>>> <a href="mailto:Incubator@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">Incubator@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
>>>>> <a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator</a><br>
>>>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>>>>> pywps-dev mailing list<br>
>>>>> <a href="mailto:pywps-dev@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">pywps-dev@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
>>>>> <a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev</a><br>
>>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> pywps-dev mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:pywps-dev@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">pywps-dev@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
>> <a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev</a><br>
><br>
</blockquote></div></blockquote></div>