<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto">Hi Jorge: what about adding PyWPS to the groupthink DockerHub organization?<div><br></div><div><a href="https://hub.docker.com/u/geopython/">https://hub.docker.com/u/geopython/</a></div><div><br></div><div>..Tom<br><br><div id="AppleMailSignature">Sent from my iPhone</div><div><br>On Dec 9, 2017, at 20:27, Jorge Mendes de Jesus <<a href="mailto:jorge.dejesus@geocat.net">jorge.dejesus@geocat.net</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div><div>Hi to all <br><br></div>I have made a docker repository for pywps <br><br><a href="https://hub.docker.com/u/pywps/dashboard/">https://hub.docker.com/u/pywps/dashboard/</a><br><br></div>The dockerfile and compositions are in the github, we have two options either ubuntu or alpine.<br><br></div>Normally we should have 1 process for container, this is ok for pywps just using flask, but for productiton we need nginx+WSGI so at least 2 containers using docker-compose (this happens on the docker using alpine)<br><br></div>In the base of ubuntu I made things using a phusion image (fat docker)<br><a href="https://github.com/phusion/baseimage-docker#contents">https://github.com/phusion/baseimage-docker#contents</a><br><br></div><div>This is a single container running multiple processes (no docker compose) this is a bit agans docker-philosofy but I find it better for pywps<br><br></div><div>When I have the time (after xtmas)will look at docker volumes <br><br></div><div>Jorge<br></div></div>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>pywps-dev mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:pywps-dev@lists.osgeo.org">pywps-dev@lists.osgeo.org</a></span><br><span><a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev</a></span></div></blockquote></div></body></html>