[Qgis-developer] Cleanly create memory layer in Python?
wonder.sk at gmail.com
Wed Jan 19 14:50:32 EST 2011
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Chris Crook <ccrook at linz.govt.nz> wrote:
> I've added submitted a patch to implement this change at http://trac.osgeo.org/qgis/ticket/3414.
> Changes made are:
> * QgsCoordinateReferenceSystem? string constructor has been generalised to allow string formats
> This is implemented by a createFromString function, similar to the createFromId function
> * Changed QgsMemoryProvider URI format to:
I would probably prefer to have uri "point?...." instead of
"memory?geometry=point&..." since the fact that we are using memory
provider is given as another parameter to the vector layer
constructor, so in future we would save some typing ;-)
> The URI can contain the following items:
> index=yes - creates a spatial index
> crs=... - defines the CRS in one of the formats above
> field=definition - defines an attribute field.
> The field definition is a field name, optionally followed by :type(length,precision), where type is one of integer, int, real, double, and string (int/integer are synonyms, as are real/double). Eg
> This uses Qurl for encoding and decoding the strings. To provide backwards compatibility, if there is no geometry query string field, then the path is taken as the geometry type. For example
> * Added an option crs=xxxx to the QgsDelimitedTextProvider URI, so that plugin code can specify the CRS when creating a delimited text layer. The crs can be any of the formats listed above. Also updated the provider to use Qurl for encoding and decoding the URI, to ensure consistent handling of special characters.
> * Made a couple of small fixes to the QgsMemoryProviderPlugin UI component to ensure that it correctly remembers the last choice of delimiter type (and to encode the data source URI using Qurl)
Then it would be also great to have the possibility to set CRS in the GUI...
> One thing I haven't done is to modify the handling of datasourceUri in QgsVectorLayer to ensure that it always uses the datasourceUri from the provider, rather than storing its own version when the layer is created (or the provider is reset). I'm not sure how safe this would be - that is whether all the data providers correctly handle the datasourceUri() function. I think this would be the right thing to do though - I think that the provider should be responsible for its own URI. Any comments on the wisdom of changing this would be welcome!
Currently I don't really like this idea. It's not usual that data
source URI would change inside the provider, so I would be happy to
keep the current situation. Developers can be advised to use the new
syntax (after all it's less verbose) and we have no problems.
More information about the Qgis-developer