[Qgis-developer] Raster min/max load

[G. Allegri]

I also agree that your first solution is the clearest one.
I generally avoid hiding the default options ore making the opposite option
of the one checkable by the user not evident.

giovanni

Inviato da dispositivo mobile
Il giorno 28/lug/2012 23.07, "Larry Shaffer" <larrys at dakotacarto.com> ha
scritto:

> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Nathan Woodrow <madmanwoo at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I would vote for this one http://goo.gl/IfZbf as, like you said,
> > required less thinking on the users part.  It is also more explicit
> > then the second one as the user isn't sure what unticking "Current
> > Extent" really means.
> >
> > - Nathan
>
> Radim,
>
> I also like the second choice, with extra grouping. Coming from the
> perspective of someone who doesn't use the histogram features very
> often, I found http://goo.gl/IfZbf to be fairly straightforward.
>
> Also, the condensed version has multiple radio button groups within
> the same group box, which I not only found a bit confusing, but also
> would require further coding or sub-layouts to create isolated radio
> button groups, whereas the extra group box layout does that
> automatically.
>
> Larry
>
>
> > On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Radim Blazek <radim.blazek at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> I am working on 2-98% cumulative pixel count cut (raster stretch
> >> min/max, stdev alternative). Adding that option into raster
> >> properties, I found the "Load min/max values" (http://goo.gl/xl2Ti)
> >> group a bit confusing, it was mixing method, extent and accuracy, all
> >> in one group:
> >>   * Estimate - accuracy
> >>   * Actual - accuracy
> >>   * CurrentExtent - extent
> >>   * Standard deviation - method
> >>
> >> Following QGIS HIG "Group related elements using group boxes" I added
> >> groups for extent and accuracy (logically, there should be another one
> >> for method, but that would result in another group header just under
> >> "Load min/max values"): http://goo.gl/IfZbf
> >> From that widget it is clear I believe, what each checkbox means and
> >> how do they work together. It is crowded, however.
> >>
> >> I simplified it removing the groups and checkboxes for defaults:
> >> http://goo.gl/4XmpR
> >> It looks better but does not follow HIG and user must think more to
> >> imagine what are opposites of "Current extent" and "Estimate".
> >>
> >> Which one is preferred? Do you have better idea?
> >>
> >> With 3 parameters as input, it is also impossible to have loading
> >> min/max as an action in histogram tab (commented for now) until we add
> >> all combinations.
> >>
> >> Radim
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Qgis-developer mailing list
> >> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> > _______________________________________________
> > Qgis-developer mailing list
> > Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20120729/348973f9/attachment-0001.html>