Re: [Qgis-developer] Removing old labelling

[cavallini@faunalia.it]

Please Aldo note that the new labelling is very slow, and has a number of bugs to be fixed before removing the old one.
Thanks.

http://faunalia.it/pc
Sent from mobile, sorry for being short

----- Reply message -----
Da: bernhard.stroebl at jena.de
A: <qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org>
Oggetto: [Qgis-developer] Removing old labelling
Data: lun, mar 5, 2012 07:08


Nathan,

thanks for the move. Two labelling eninges is impossible to explain to 
users. One thing, though: The old engine allows for setting a rotation 
independent from also setting an x and y field.

Bernhard

Am 05.03.2012 05:11, schrieb Nathan Woodrow:
> Hi all,
>
> Any objections for removing the old labelling stuff?
>
> Is there anything the old one can do the new one can't?
>
> I'm finding users are getting confused that there are two
> different labelling engines and this is bad for user experience.  Also
> makes training hard as you have to tell people to ignore that part of
> the program when labelling is something everyone wants to do.
>
> If all +1s to the above.
>
> Should we make this change in upcoming 1.8?
>
> - Nathan
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
>
> ________ Information from NOD32 ________
> This message was checked by NOD32 Antivirus System for Linux Mail Server.
> http://www.nod32.com



________ Information from NOD32 ________
This message was checked by NOD32 Antivirus System for Linux Mail Server.
http://www.nod32.com
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20120305/f962917a/attachment.html