[Qgis-developer] ELSE expression is used when other rules are set not visible - Feature or Bug?
Matthias Kuhn
matthias at opengis.ch
Fri Jun 19 07:33:56 PDT 2015
Just my 2 cents on a topic I know nothing about :)
... or we can have a "disable rule" and an "invisible rule". Disabled
rules go to ELSE, invisible rules don't go to ELSE.
Cheers
On 06/19/2015 04:13 PM, Alexandre Neto wrote:
> So, can I open a ticket?
>
> Alexandre
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Andreas Neumann <a.neumann at carto.net
> <mailto:a.neumann at carto.net>> wrote:
>
> In my opinion this is a bug. I agree that by switching off the
> rule should not make the features fall into the ELSE rule. At
> least from a usability point of view. Or we need to ELSE rules - a
> "TRUE ELSE" rule that behaves like now and an "ELSE" rule that
> behaves like the users expect it to behave.
>
> Andreas
>
>
> On 19.06.2015 13:36, Etienne Trimaille wrote:
>> I've this kind of bug too.
>>
>> If you create a categorized symbology, apply the change and then
>> switch to a ruled-based symbology (keeping the previous rules),
>> you will see that the ELSE statement will draw features twice.
>>
>> Enable "show feature count" to check.
>>
>> I didn't check if there is a ticket for that.
>>
>>
>> 2015-06-19 13:18 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Neto <senhor.neto at gmail.com
>> <mailto:senhor.neto at gmail.com>>:
>>
>> Indeed Nathan,
>>
>> But do you thinks that is what you were expecting? when you
>> turn the "layer" off?
>>
>> Alexandre
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Nathan Woodrow
>> <madmanwoo at gmail.com <mailto:madmanwoo at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> I would say they are getting skipped in the rule check so
>> fall into the else rule.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 9:05 pm Alexandre Neto
>> <senhor.neto at gmail.com <mailto:senhor.neto at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Using the rule-based symbology with several rules and
>> an ELSE expression. If you, in map canvas legend, set
>> a rule "layer" to invisible, all it's features will
>> be represented with the ELSE Symbol.
>>
>> Not sure if this is the expected behaviour. I would
>> expect that those feature would simply became invisible.
>>
>> Should I open a ticket?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Alexandre Neto
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-developer mailing list
>> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
>> <mailto:Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org>
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-developer mailing list
>> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
>> <mailto:Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org>
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-developer mailing list
>> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org>
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org>
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20150619/cd818815/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20150619/cd818815/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Qgis-developer
mailing list