[Qgis-developer] Geometry Checker contra Topology Checker

[Luigi Pirelli]

I was planning to add Export functionality to Topology Checker during
next HM in Gran Canaria... but now I'm confused where to focus my
work.
If I read well the code, the Topogy Checker have a result data
structure where all geometry of the errors, bbox and more are
maintained.
I didn't test the SourcePole plugin and I don't know if it manage
inter/layer check... well I remeber the presentation in Nodebo, but I
didn't realize this kind of "plugin conflict". So, in this moment, I
remain focusing my work on Topology Checker.

regards,

Luigi Pirelli

**************************************************************************************************
* LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli
* Elance: https://www.elance.com/s/edit/luigipirelli/
* GitHub: https://github.com/luipir
* Stackexchange: http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/19667/luigi-pirelli
* Mastering QGIS:
https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/mastering-qgis
**************************************************************************************************


On 7 October 2015 at 09:25, Radim Blazek <radim.blazek at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it> wrote:
>> Il 06/10/2015 23:23, Nyall Dawson ha scritto:
>>
>>> We also should move the first one to the analysis library, so that the
>>> routines are accessible by plugins and processing framework.... Just
>>> another item on the TODO list!
>>
>> sure, big improvement. better opening a ticket?
>> Giovanni, could you please add tickets for the missing features of the
>> new plugin, and one for the removal of previous plugins?
>> all the best, and thanks.
>
> I must say that I like more the concept of rules in Topology Checker
> instead of one big dialog used in Geometry Checker. Both from UI and
> programming point of view. It is more flexible and extensible. I am
> curious why a new plugin was started instead of improvement of the old
> one. I don't think that the Topology Checker should be simply removed
> until we have something similar in terms of definition and
> implementation of rules.
>
> Radim
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer